A Comparative Study on Selected Psychological Variables between Male and Female Shooters

A Comparison of Stress and Anxiety Levels in Male and Female Shooters

by Ms. Pooja Pal*, Dr. Pushpendra Purashwani,

- Published in Journal of Advances in Science and Technology, E-ISSN: 2230-9659

Volume 18, Issue No. 2, Sep 2021, Pages 1 - 3 (3)

Published by: Ignited Minds Journals


ABSTRACT

A major component of success in shooting is psychological parameter, compounded with physical and physiological factors. The purpose of the study was to compare the selected psychological variables between male and female shooters. For the purpose of the study, 30 Shooters were selected, 15 Males and 15 Females, age between 15 to 21, with state level participation. Two psychological variables were chosen of the study, Stress and Anxiety. For Anxiety, Sports Competition Anxiety Test (SCAT), was used and for Stress Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) was used. Independent t Test was applied for the study the level of significance was set at 0.05. The result shows that there was no significant difference found between male and female shooters for stress and anxiety.

KEYWORD

comparative study, psychological variables, male, female, shooters, success in shooting, psychological parameter, physical factors, physiological factors, stress, anxiety

INTRODUCTION

A traditional sport, shooting has come a long way in India, from just being confined to the maharajas of the erstwhile princely states of the country, to a sport that has gained immense popularity amongst the young sports enthusiasts. A major component of success in shooting is psychological parameter, compounded with physical and physiological factors. Shooting belongs to sensomotoric type with a specific set of psychological requirements. Shooting is a static sports in which the anxiety is different from the rest of the sports. The study of the effect of anxiety on sports performance has become a major topic of interest to sports psychologists in recent years. Ford (1968) found that some competitors did better when their anxiety levels were high and that moderate levels of anxiety seemed to elicit increases in performance. Now it is widely accepted that anxiety both trait and particularly state, plays an influential role in the sports performance of athletes. Hence, it is generally considered that performance is optimal at intermediate levels of anxiety. In the fast changing world today, no individual is free from stress and no profession is stress free. Modern life is full of stress. In many job situations, high levels of stress are an integral and largely unavoidable component of the work. The need to cope with complexity, ambiguity, conflict and competing demands is a part of professional life among individuals occupying different positions. Selye (1974) wrote that stress is essentially reflected by the rate of all the wear and tear caused by life. The consequences of high levels of job stress, personal frustration and inadequate coping skills have major personal, organizational and social costs-and these are increasing day by day. Stress has become an inevitable part of human life in recent times. It makes life more challenging and charming, however if it is there within limits. When stress is beyond the coping ability of a person, it causes disturbances in the person’s life. Stress can be due to organizational demands on a person or the demands of personal life. When all the psychological processes of an individual like attention, perception, remembering, thinking, reasoning and creativity etc, functions in a normal way, the person is able to adjust and cope with his environment, he meets the various demands of life on his own quite successfully, he is said to be of sound mental health. When the demand on a person from the environment is more and his capability to meet such demands is less, then this incapability might lead to anxiety and stress. It is observed there are lack in researches related to the shooting, especially in relation with the field of psychological intervention and analysis. Hence, the researcher felt it necessary to attempt to investigate

METHODOLOGY

This study was designed to ascertain the level of comprehensive anxiety and stress among the state level shooters, further to study the psychological variables and also their relationship with Comprehensive Anxiety and Stress of state level shooters. To achieve this purpose, total 30 state level shooters (15 male and 15 female) who had participated at state level shooting competition of 10 meters range shooting event were selected as subjects. The age of the subjects ranged between 15 to 21 years. Sport Competitive Anxiety Test by Rainer Martens and Perceived Stress Scale by Sheldon Cohen were selected as criterion measures. By using e – sources the soft copy of questionnaire was sent to the subjects and their responses were administrated and scored accordingly to the norms of the respective questionnaires. The anxiety level of subjects was taken by Sports Competition Anxiety Test (Martens, 1977). The questionnaire consists of 15 statements. The athletes responded to 15 statements by using 3 options i.e. rarely, sometimes, often. And scores were administered accordingly. The stress level of the subjects was taken by Perceived Stress Scale given by Sheldon Cohen. The questionnaire consists of 10 statements. The shooters gave their responses to all statements with five categories never, almost never, sometimes, fairly often and very often. Further the scores were administered accordingly with respect to the norms of the questionnaire. To find out the significant difference on psychological variables between male and female shooters, t test was employed, the level of significance was set at 0.05

RESULTS

Table 1 Group Statistics (Anxiety)

In the above Table-1 It is clear from table 1 that mean score of anxiety of male is 19.33 + 2.82 and mean value of anxiety of female is 20.00 + 3.54

Table 3 Group Statistics (Stress)

In Table- 3 Descriptive statistics of Stress male and female shooter Group Minimum Maximum Mean Standard Error (Mean) Standard Deviation.

Table 4 T Test for Stress

Table -4 reveals that calculated t value is -0.186 at 28 degree of freedom. Hence it is clear from the table 4 that no significant difference is there in between male and female stress score at 0.05 level of significance. Study revealed that there was no significant difference among males and females sports stress. Thus it may be concluded that the stress of male and female shooters no difference because male and female are both psychologically strong they show significant drop in tension, criticism, fatigue and confusion while they participate in any tournament or sports activities.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of analysis of results and discussion of findings the conclusions have been drawn as under: 1. There was insignificant difference in Anxiety between male and female shooters.

2. There was insignificant difference in stress between male and female shooters.

Through independent t-test it was found that no any significant difference was there in between stress

be because releasing of cortisol is not a gender dependent process. It is totally situational aspect and in this condition both the gender are facing similar situation hence no any significant difference is found in between them. Hence it can be said that male and females performance is not fluctuating because of psychological factors.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

About the authors

Miss. Pooja Pal is currently pursuing MPEd in Lakshmibai National Institute of Physical Education, Gwalior from the Department of Physical Education Pedagogy. Dr. Pushpendra Purashwani is currently working as an Associate Professor in Lakshmibai National Institute of Physical Education, Gwalior from the Department of Physical Education Pedagogy.

REFERENCES:

BOOKS

Agarwal, J.C., Educational Research, New Delhi: Agra Book Dept, 1975. Alderman, R. (1974), Psychological Behavior in Sport, Philadelphia Saunders, 1974. Apter, M.J., Bob Davis et. al. (2000), Physical Education and the Study of Sports, Sydney: Mosby Publisher. Hanin, Y.L., A Study of Anxiety in sport Richard H. Cox (2012), Sports Psychology concepts and applications, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA. In Sport Psychology: An Analysis of Athletic Behavior (edited by W.F. Straub), Movement Publications, 1980. Hanin, Y.L., State Trait Anxiety Research on Sports in the USSR, In Cross-cultural Anxiety, Vol. 3 edited by C.D. The Experience of Motivation: The Theory of Psychological Reversal, London: Academic Press, 1982. Bawa and Bebnath (1991), Sports Competitive Anxiety in Relation the Level of Competitive. Spielberger and R. Diaz, Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 1986. Hardy, L., Jones, J.G. and Gould, D., Understanding Psychological cuspte Anxiety, In Ergogenic Aids and Muscular

JOURNALS AND PERIODICALS

Amutha, V. and V. Jayanthi (2010), “Comparative Analysis of Selected Psycho Motor Parameters Between Volleyball Players and Athletes”, Abstracts, Research Journal on Physical Education and Sports, Vol. V, Issue-1, pp. 7-13 Ajmer Sing, Bara RS (1998). Competitive Anxiety Difference between Male and Female Handball Players, NIS Scientific Journal; 2(1): pp. 43. Amarendra AS (2011). A Study of Sports Competitive Anxiety and Self Confidence among National Level Shooters, Bangalore University, Bangalore. Bandopadhyay Kanchan (2008), “Psycho-physiological Reactivity and Kinesthetic Perception to Creative Arts and Play Therapy among Mentally Retarded Boys”, Abstracts Journal, Vol. 8, Issue-1, JanJune, pp. 32-37. Burrows, G.C., Cox, T. and Simpson, G.C. (1977), “The measurement of stress in a sales training situation”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 50, pp. 45–51 Cohen, S. and Williamson, G. (1988), Perceived Stress in a Probability Sample of the United States. Spacapan, S. and Oskamp, S. (Eds.) The Social Psychology of Health. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Hackford D, Spielberger CD (1989). Anxiety in Sports (New York: Hemisphere Publishing, pp. 3‐20. 4. Dixie Anne Grimmett. Psychology and Physiology

Corresponding Author Ms. Pooja Pal*

M.P.Ed. Student, Department of Physical Education Pedagogy, LNIPE, Gwalior

pooja02072@gmail.com