Feasibility of Precast Super Structures for Pune Metro Project

Concrete is the maximum critical a part of the present-day shape. Concrete offers compressive energy to the shape which facilitates shape to resist compressive forces. There are distinctive strategies of concreting one in all that is traditional technique of concreting known as cast-in-situ that is normally used for production in construction. This is the oldest technique of concreting and getting used for decades in production of construction industry. Even if this technique is an oldest technique, its drawbacks can't be neglected as exceptional of structure or shape is depending on great quality of concreting. The maximum critical downside of cast-in-situ technique is high-satisfactory quality of concrete can't be reliable and extra time required for production of construction. Whereas now a days Precast is in boom and it requires less amount of time to execute on site. Hence In precast concrete technique excellent concrete may be confident as concrete is ready in controlled environment. Speed of creation is simply speedy as compared to cast-in-situ creation. Here is feasibility of precast superstructures for Pune Metro Project.

• In recent years, India uses the traditional method of "CAST IN SITU" which has many disadvantages such as taking longer, weather delay, labour, quality assurance less than. • Today, the world is reaching heights in the use of precast concrete. When comparing with foreign countries, India lacks knowledge about prefab house, its value and its use. • For this matter, the prefabricated superstructure must also be developed in infrastructure projects. 1.2 Scope of Project: In the context that most of the labour is scarce and expensive, requiring fast-paced and high-quality projects, the construction industry is gradually shifting to prefabricated construction. Research shows that access to urban prefab technology and related infrastructure in the form of sewers, bridges and pipelines leads to faster and leaner construction with less significantly more labour on site, better site control, higher precision and quality of finish. Prefabricated technology in bridges and overpasses is popular all over the world and hence India. It has

a) To study the need of precast structures in infrastructure projects. b) To find out demerits of cast in situ for infrastructure in metro cities. c) To study the manufacturing process of precast structural elements and its applications. d) By taking suitable case study compared to analysis between cast-in-situ and precast construction in consideration of time, quality and cost.

Past research through literature review from various journal papers. Study of cast in situ and precast applications, advantages, disadvantages. Comparative study between cast in situ and precast structures in terms of cost, quality and time. Detailed case study of Pune metro precast superstructures.

Infrastructure is an important sector that drives the overall development of the Indian economy. The Planning Committee's Infrastructure Secretariat is involved in launching Policy, which ensures that world-class infrastructure is created in the country for a limited time. This section focuses on the development of electricity, bridges, dams, roads and urban infrastructure. Users are provided with details about projects, organizations, policies, schedules, plans, and costs for the infrastructure. After consideration of complications for shuttering and reinforcement Pune Metro is using the offsite casting process for elements i.e., Precast concrete method. at the site. It offers the designer endless possibilities of any shape with an unlimited selection of surface structures. Cast-in-situ concrete is a construction technology that drives the walls and ceilings of buildings into formwork on site. This is different from the precast concrete technology where slabs are poured elsewhere and transported to the site for assembly. Instead of brick and wooden panels, we use concrete slabs for the walls and formwork for both the walls and roof.

1. With this method, the body is poured where it is needed, without the need to lift or transport heavy objects. 2. Great way to build a bridge in an inaccessible place. 3. This method is used for low-cost construction of solid, hollow, or ribbed reinforced concrete slab bridges.

1. It takes longer time than the precast method. 2. If the bridge is built over a body of water, it can seriously damage uncured concrete during floods. 3. This method requires a large number of workers and requires professional supervision. 4. Wastage of concrete is more.

Precast concrete is a construction product manufactured by pouring concrete into a reusable shape or "mold", hardening it in a controlled environment, transporting it to a construction site, and lifting it into place. On-site casting obstructs traffic flow. Off-site casting and construction processes facilitate the construction of subway stations and allows ease and faster construction.

1. When concrete the same components, it is advantageous to use the same formwork. Better quality control is possible in factories

2. You can create a smoother exposed surface that does not require plaster. 3. Precast work can be performed in any weather as long as the concrete holes provide sufficient protection. 4. You can make finished parts into the desired shape without any hassle. 5. When required, they may be dismantled without any breakage. 6. Curing can be done more effectively and economically. 7. Constructions can be erected mostly under all climatic conditions.

To avoid labour shortages, delays and to deliver quality products, promoters and builders are now applying the technology. prefabricated technology. The main advantages of prefabricated technology are quality, speed of construction and an economical product. Using such technology can save up to 64% of the time required for similar projects using conventional construction methods and technologies. In other words, while the conventional brick and mortar method takes a year to complete a building, the prefab method takes about four months. The top benefits due to precast concrete strength and uniformity are as follows: 1. Structurally safe and effective. 2. Pre-built and pre-installed. 3. Weather and large precast concrete elements. 4. Thermal friendly. 5. Safety and large-scale infrastructure demands.

The activities of the main process are as follows. 1. Mold preparation and assembly. 3. Install pipes and inserts as needed. 4. Place the concrete in the formwork. 5. Vibration and finishing of concrete. 6. Remove the mold from the mold, remove the unit and stack the products for curing. 7. Curing is complete. It is preferable to use steam curing.

The price of the product depends on the size and quantity of the product. The initial cost of precast concrete is higher than cast-in-place, but later proves to be effective.

have a well-planned approach to work. If we can't get the Construction moving along faster, it will be harder to make any further progress. Precast products can be cast before the work is started, if proper time scheduling is done. This will help to speed up the work progress. Where Cast in situ is slower than traditional methods, where elements can't be casted before the execution, these delays work and scheduling.

Total construction time is less as compared to cast-in-situ. Speedy construction is possible.

Total construction time is more as compared to precast. Speed is less as elements are casted at site.

Precast products provide a higher level of quality assurance because the production of the elements can be monitored carefully and under controlled conditions in a lab. The object is inspected and tested by experts and technicians. Cast in situ can't provide quality products because of improper scaffoldings. The segregation of the honey, the bleeding of the bee, and the combing process reduce the quality of the product.

Quality can be controlled and maintained easily.

Quality control and maintenance is difficult.

Precast concrete products need to be durable in order to meet the requirements of the user. Products that are used above or below ground may be exposed to harsh environmental conditions. Without durability, a concrete product can deteriorate much faster than the expected lifespan of 50 to 100 years.

It is durable because of high grade of concrete and well compaction. Precast elements are of good quality and are more durable compared to cast-in-situ. Improper casting affects the durability of the product.

To successfully complete a construction project on time and with high quality, it is essential to have skilled workers and machinery in good working order. Prefabricated construction requires less labor compared to monolithic construction Precast is a good choice for large construction projects, because it is affordable. Cast in situ is a good choice for small construction projects, because it is affordable and can be done quickly.

Less labours are required. Skilled labours are required at construction site.

More labours are required. Skilled labours are required at construction site. Local contractors can also build the structure. Cast-in-situ concrete does not require such handling equipment.

Hence feasibility of precast construction is more in terms of time, quality, durability, workers and machinery.

We have reviewed both in-situ construction and precast construction methods, and have come to a conclusion about each. Precast concrete solutions can help reduce the waste generated on site by up to 50% compared to traditional construction sites. The initial cost of precast construction is more than cast-in-situ construction because the cost of skilled labor in India is higher than the cost of unskilled labor. There is a lack of knowledge about precast construction among potential homebuyers. Because the pouring of the prefabricated arm can be carried out at the same time as the pouring of the piers in the station area, it is a method with low cost, high efficiency and high safety, which not only shortens the completion time of the project, but also reduces the complex structure pouring. - Live casting on moving traffic These recent successes have shown that this cost-effective option is very effective. Further research will be focused on the

[1] Vaishali Turai, Ashish Waghmare (2016), “A study of cost comparison of precast concrete vs cast in place concrete” International Journal of advanced Engineering Research and applications – Volume 2, Pages 11. [2] P. Karthigai Priya, M. Neamitha (2018), “A review on precast concrete” International Research Journal of engineering and technology - Volume 5, Pages 5. [3] Suraj Kumar (2019), “A comparative study on Precast / Prefabricated structures and cast in situ structures”, International Research Journal of engineering and technology - Volume 8, Pages 3. [4] Azharuddin Ahmed; Dr. Anup Kumar Mandal (2020), “Benefits and Challenges of Precast Construction in India – A Review”, SSRG International Journal of civil engineering – Volume 7, pages 4. [5] Manbhawan Singh, Jatin Mehta, Kapil Soni (2019), “Study on Comparison of Pre-cast & Cast in Situ Construction of the Structure based on Economic Category”, International Research Journal of engineering and technology - Volume 6, Pages5. [6] Akash Lanke, Dr. D. Venkateswarlu (2016), “Design, Cost & Time analysis of Precast & RCC building”, International Research Journal of engineering and technology - Volume 3, Pages 8. [7] Sayali A. More, Aishwarya V. Patil (2017), “Time, Cost, Productivity and Quality Analysis of Precast Building”, International Research Journal of engineering and technology - Volume 4, Pages 4. [8] Noor Azim Mohd Radzi, Roszilah Hamid, Azrul A. Mutalib, & A. B. M. Amrul Kaish (2020), “A Review of Precast Concrete Beam-to-Column Connections Subjected to Severe Fire Conditions”, Hindawi - Volume 2020, Pages 23. [9] Josef Novak, Alena Kohoutkova, Vladimir Kristek and Jan Vodicka (2017), “Precast concrete pavement – systems and performance review”, IOP Publishing, Pages 9. [10] Nagaraju Kaja, Anupam Jauswal (2021), “Review of Precast Concrete Technology in India”, International Research Journal of [11] Vikas Kumar Patel. V. V. Singh (2017), “A Review on Precast Cement Concrete Paver Blocks Using Fly Ash”, International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology – Volume 3, Pages 5. [12] Dr. Sachin Admane, Prof. Y R Suryawanshi, Mr. Ajit Dhumal (2015), “Literature work study of precast concrete connections in seismic”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology – Volume 6, Pages 1. [13] Stephan Johann Fasching, Tobias Huber, Michael Rath and Johann Kollegger (2021), “Semi-Precast Segmental Bridge Construction Method Experimental Investigation on the Shear Transfer in Longitudinal and Transverse Direction”, Applied Sciences – Pages 23. [14] TENDER NO. P1C-06/2017 Name of Work: Construction of seven (07) nos. elevated metro Rail stations excluding viaduct viz. RAMWADI, KALYANI NAGAR, YERWADA, BUND GARDEN, RUBY HALL CLINIC, PUNE STN. & MANGALWARPETH on Reach-2 of PUNE METRO RAIL PROJECT.

Final Year Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Padmabhooshan Vasantdada Patil Institute of Technology Pune, Maharashtra, India