Adaptive Control Techniques for Improving the Performance of Robotic Systems

As useful tools for improving the performance of robotic systems, adaptive control techniques have recently come to light. Robots using these strategies may adapt to shifting surroundings and unpredictability‘s by continually monitoring and altering system settings. As a solution to problems like inaccurate modeling, outside disruptions, and parameter fluctuations, they offer resilience, precision, and efficiency. To provide accurate trajectory tracking, stability, and increased disturbance rejection, adaptive control algorithms use real-time data to update control rules. On the basis of online data, they may optimize control tactics, boosting system performance and supplying flexibility for challenging jobs. Therefore, adaptive control strategies play a crucial role in improving robotic systems' capabilities and enabling them to function in a variety of dynamic contexts.

According to Fan et al. 2020, Applying cutting-edge model learning techniques to controls is a fascinating idea, especially given the recent success of deep learning. On ―safety-critical systems‖, which have requirements for reliability, ―stability, and real-time performance‖, there is significant resistance to using these techniques. They provide a methodology that complies with these restrictions and allows deep neural networks to be used for learning model uncertainty (Fan et al. 2020). Utilizing Bayesian model learning, which offers a way to exercise appropriate levels of caution in the face of uncertainty, is a key component of their methodology. In the suggested method, they provide an adaptive control framework using the principles of ―stochastic Control Lyapunov Functions and Control Barrier Functions‖, as well as ―tractable Bayesian model learning using Gaussian Processes or Bayesian neural networks‖.

(Source: Fan et al. 2020) According to Ouyang et al. 2019, this work presents a study of control for a helicopter system with an undetermined ―2-degree of freedom (DOF)‖. Input dead zone and output restrictions apply to the 2-DOF helicopter. The ―neural network‖ approach is used because of its capacity to approximate in order to deal with system uncertainties and input dead zones. An ―adaptive control‖ approach is used to update the neural network's weights, which increases the flexibility of the system. The ―integral barrier Lyapunov function (IBLF)‖ is also used in control design to ensure the existence of output and convergence (Ouyang et al. 2019). Finally, numerical simulations are run using the Quanser 2-DOF helicopter model to show the practicality and effectiveness of the recommended control.

(Source: Ouyang et al. 2019)

Robotic System: An actual robot or a simulation environment that can carry out tasks. Sensors: the right sensors, such as encoders, cameras, force/torque sensors, or other perception tools, for gathering real-time data. Actuators: To control the motions of the robot, actuators are used, such as motors, pneumatic systems, or hydraulic systems. Control Hardware: For implementing control algorithms, hardware components may include computers, embedded systems, or microcontrollers (Huang et al. 2020). Software: Software libraries and coding tools for creating and putting into practice adaptive control algorithms.

System Modeling: Create a mathematical model of the robotic system by taking its dynamics, kinematics, and other important factors into account. For creating the adaptive control system, this model is used as a foundation. Control Algorithm Selection: Depending on the unique needs of the robotic system, select a suitable adaptive control algorithm. ―Model reference adaptive control (MRAC)‖, ―adaptive sliding mode control (ASMC)‖, and ―adaptive neuro-fuzzy control‖ are examples of common methodologies. Adaptive Law Design: Create the adaptive law, which controls how system parameters are modified in response to current sensor readings. This rule should make sure that the control system is stable, convergent, and robust. Real-Time Data Acquisition: Set up the sensors to continuously gather pertinent data, such as location, velocity, forces, or visual information. For efficient adaptation, make sure the facts are dependable and correct. Control Implementation: Apply the control algorithm to the hardware platform of choice. Creating software code and interacting with the actuators and sensors of the robotic system may be necessary for this (Kebriaet al. 2019). Iterative Refinement: Determine opportunities for improvement by analyzing the system's performance. To improve the overall performance of the robotic system, tweak the adaptive control method and settings as appropriate.

(Source: Self-created in draw.io)

Trajectory Tracking: When performing tasks like manipulating robotic arms or navigating mobile robots, adaptive control allows for accurate trajectory monitoring, minimizing mistakes, and increasing overall accuracy. Disturbance Rejection: In order to provide reliable performance even in dynamic contexts or when confronted with unforeseen pressures, adaptive control algorithms efficiently adjust for external disruptions. Parameter Adaptation: The system is more adaptable when control settings may be changed based on real-time data, enabling the robot to adapt to shifting circumstances or changes in its dynamics. Stability: With the stability assurances offered by adaptive control techniques, the control system is guaranteed to be stable-free and maintain its robustness even in the face of uncertainty. Flexibility: These approaches are appropriate for applications that call for versatility and adaptability because of their adaptable character, which enables the robotic system to undertake challenging tasks and adjust to changing operating circumstances.

Robustness: The resilience of adaptive control is against ambiguities, disruptions, and parameter changes (Luan et al. 2019). This improves robotic systems' dependability and stability, allowing them to function successfully in real-world situations. Adaptability: Robots are able to adapt to shifting surroundings and shifting job needs because of adaptive control's capacity to change control parameters in real-time based on sensor data. To manage complicated and dynamic activities, they must be flexible. Model Accuracy: The effectiveness of adaptive control algorithms is directly influenced by the precision of the system model utilized. Complex robotic systems are difficult to effectively represent, necessitating the use of advanced modeling approaches and system identification procedures. Convergence and Stability: A major problem still lies in creating adaptive rules that guarantee convergence to desired performance and stability. The risk of instability or overshooting during adaptation must be carefully considered and analyzed. In conclusion, adaptive control techniques have shown to be useful tools for increasing the effectiveness of robotic systems. Robots are capable of handling unpredictability, disturbances, and parameter variations thanks to their greater stability, resilience, and adaptability. Through real-time parameter adaptation and trajectory tracking, adaptive control approaches have demonstrated improved accuracy and efficacy in a range of robotic applications.

Integration with Machine Learning: The benefits of both strategies can be maximized by combining adaptive control methods with machine learning algorithms. Robotic systems may become more adaptive and capable of learning as a result of this integration, enabling them to build and enhance control strategies according to data-driven insights. Multi-robot Systems: There are new opportunities and obstacles when adapting adaptive control methods to multi-robot systems (Koksalet al. 2020). The performance and cooperation of numerous robots operating together can be improved by developing coordinated control techniques, adaptive formation control, and task allocation algorithms. Real-Time Optimization: The performance of robotic systems may be further optimized by combining real-time optimization methods with adaptive control strategies (Na et al. 2019). Dynamic job distribution, resource optimization, and energy management are all included in this to increase productivity and flexibility. Robustness to Uncertain Environments: Future research should focus on the development of adaptive control techniques that can withstand extremely unpredictable or changing settings. To ensure dependable operation under difficult circumstances, environmental considerations, sensor noise, and unforeseen occurrences must be taken into account.

Research on Hybrid Approaches: Examine how adaptive control methods may be used in conjunction with other control approaches, such as optimum control, machine learning, and reinforcement learning. The effectiveness of robotic systems can be improved overall by using the advantages of various methodologies and employing hybrid techniques. Benchmarking and Standardization: To assess the effectiveness of various adaptive control approaches, establish benchmarking criteria and Hardware Integration: Design robotic systems especially suited for adaptive control techniques in cooperation with hardware vendors (Hu et al. 2020). This entails combining sensors, actuators, and hardware for high-performance control and real-time adaption. Practical Applications: Concentrate on using adaptive control methods in practical robotic applications, such as industrial automation, healthcare, or autonomous cars. To verify the efficacy of adaptive control in real-world contexts, conduct thorough field tests and case studies.

1. Fan, D.D., Nguyen, J., Thakker, R., Alatur, N., Agha-mohammadi, A.A. and Theodorou, E.A., 2020, May. Bayesian learning-based adaptive control for safety critical systems. In 2020 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) (pp. 4093-4099). IEEE. 2. Ouyang, Y., Dong, L., Xue, L. and Sun, C., 2019. Adaptive control based on neural networks for an uncertain 2-DOF helicopter system with input deadzone and output constraints. IEEE/CAA Journal of AutomaticaSinica, 6(3), pp.807-815. 3. Huang, H., Yang, C. and Chen, C.P., 2020. Optimal robot–environment interaction under broad fuzzy neural adaptive control. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 51(7), pp.3824-3835. 4. Kebria, P.M., Khosravi, A., Nahavandi, S., Shi, P. and Alizadehsani, R., 2019. Robust adaptive control scheme for teleoperation systems with delay and uncertainties. IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 50(7), pp.3243-3253. 5. Sun, N., Liang, D., Wu, Y., Chen, Y., Qin, Y. and Fang, Y., 2019. Adaptive control for pneumatic artificial muscle systems with parametric uncertainties and unidirectional input constraints. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(2), pp.969-979. 6. Luan, F., Na, J., Huang, Y. and Gao, G., 2019. Adaptive neural network control for robotic manipulators with guaranteed finite-time convergence. Neurocomputing, 337, pp.153-164. 7. Koksal, N., An, H. and Fidan, B., 2020. Backstepping-based adaptive control of a quadrotor UAV with guaranteed tracking performance. ISA transactions, 105, pp.98-110. 8. Na, J., Jing, B., Huang, Y., Gao, G. and Zhang, C., 2019. Unknown system dynamics estimator for motion control of nonlinear robotic systems. Lennox, B., 2020. Cooperative control of heterogeneous connected vehicle platoons: An adaptive leader-following approach. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 5(2), pp.977-984.

Student, St. Joseph‘s Academy, Dehradun