A Study on Construction Safety Management Model System

Enhancing Safety in the Construction Industry

by MD Moizuddin*, Dr. Jaibir Singh Yadav,

- Published in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, E-ISSN: 2230-7540

Volume 16, Issue No. 11, Nov 2019, Pages 39 - 45 (7)

Published by: Ignited Minds Journals


ABSTRACT

The research studies because construction site accidents are caused in India and how they can reduce constructional accidents. This Article analyzes in greater detail the factors that affect safety at construction sites. Discuss the strategies that companies in India follow to provide protection at work and, ultimately, look at the best approaches to introduce safety management procedures in the construction industry.

KEYWORD

construction safety, management model system, construction site accidents, reduce accidents, factors affecting safety, protection at work, safety management procedures, construction industry

INTRODUCTION

Construct health is a big challenge worldwide because of its special existence. To boost this condition, many nations have enacted laws governing on-site healthy workplace conditions such as Canada, Singapore and the United Kingdom. A supporter of self-administration activism. Several building firms have begun to systematically implement effective methods of protection management. The main part of construction of Finite is built of developing countries including India with an 11at in terms of its infrastructure and manufacturing industry. Building stray is rising as rapidly. Fat is the absence of the wakening protection and health unit. This is partly attributed to the lack of representative structures and the flawless application of uniform rules. A health management program for the building industry must also be built.

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION SAFETY MANAGEMEW SYSTEM (TCSMS) MODEL

In the current research the latest Spurn model was built for Total Construction Safety Management (Figure 1.1). It is a three-phase approach: 1) Stage of strategy and preparing, 2) Stage of deployment and operation; 3) Group intervention and control process.

Health Safety Environment HSE Policy

Top level management defines the protection strategy that encompasses the purpose, reach, legal obligation, obligation to enforce the protection of any individual of a company and quality development by addressing of HSE meetings all staff and staff under the department. Present at project headquarters, boards of note, camp of workers, canteen and extraordinary place.

Customer requirements

It is a condition that the customer sends us before putting an order.

Legal requirements

Onsite review and accordance with the following legal specifications should be provided. If any other customer-specified statutory requirement is also taken into account.

UM of applicable legal Requirements

• Building and Other construction workers (regulation of employment and condition of service) act 1995 and rules • Petroleum Act 1934 and Petroleum Rules, 2002 • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 • Explosives Act, 1811 • Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1951 • Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974, and Rules, 1975 • The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 • Batteries (Management and Handling) Rules, 2001 • Environment Protection Act. 1985 and Rules, 1985 • Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998 etc.‖

Management review

Management will assess the state of occupational health execution and results. Accident reports, regulatory enforcement and company criteria for quality enhancement as regular interval.

Phase 1 - Planning and Preparation Phase (Figure 1.1)

In this phase, the safety program must be initiated by construction organizations, via an effective pm planning and resource development process. During this period, organizations need to establish a vision, develop a strong senior management commitment, and develop a training plan for employees. And will ensure that the software modifications are accommodated by all operational tools. In summary, the recently developed total model for the management of construction safety is shown in Figure 1.1.

Figure 1.1 Total Construction Safety Management Model

Program It requires specific protection monitoring criteria to be tracked on location. • Highlights of the plant. • Diagram of structure. • The responsibilities and tasks. • Statutes, regulations and guidelines available. • Policies and general workplace health laws. • Recognition and effective protection procedures in high-risk / hazardous activities. • Machine Research Helps. • Collection of reviews and records. • Disaster response action program. • Database of on-site work-specific personal security equipment. • Planning program preparation program.

II. Job Hazard Analysis (JHA)

Site engineers schedule the work threat report in coordination with the protection manager and the boss. There are known essential workers with threats and hazards. Such tasks are split into various phases (i.e. sub-activities). Every stage includes defining threats / hazards and implementing effective precautionary steps. Throughout the purposes of execution, work risk identification is distributed among those involved. It aims to deter and take precautionary steps to avoid danger and dangers involved with a job safely. Table 4.1 indicates the model for this work. The checklist would provide essential steps before doing the job.

Table 1.1 Job Hazard analysis format

III. Health Safety Environment tHSE1 site based objectives

After consultation with contractors' representatives that adhere to the protection policies established by the top level management, site-based goals will be established out by the HSE Committee. Based on the following principles, the goal will be:

b. Defining individual duty, avoidance of hazards and the obligation for health protection, at increasing stage of the construction department. c. Identify and identify coordinated prevention activities in the sense of high-risk operations in the area of the study. d. Making sure all the applicable law is complied with. e. Continuous HSE development by working regularly on the key areas for change.

Phase 2 — Implementation and operation Phase (Figure 1.1)

Through this step, safety goals and priorities are established. Education of strategy and rational decision-making on defense systems. The main problems at this point are described below:

i. Health Safety Environment (HSE) Ownership

The tasks, duty and authority for conducting research on safety issues should be described. The treatment is prescribed for management and other workers in the company. Senior management provides demonstrable guidance and dedication in overseeing operations through constructive involvement in HSE. Their leadership and commitments lead to the resources needed for development. To run and sustain HSE and to meet HSE objectives and legal specifications. CEOs are committed to managing their entire business. 'As Weak as Irrational' (ALARP) costs.

a. Visibility

Table 1.2 demonstrates the management to have solid, tangible guidance and dedication to HSE by presenting a specific example. Management holds HSE seminars. Conduct checks and HSE assessments to maintain a good HSE mindset.

b. Proactive in target setting

Project management demonstrates that in the present job the target is pro-active. Table 1.3 indicates.

Table 1.3 Proactive targets selling

c. Company Safety Culture

The management will strive to create and sustain a organizational atmosphere under which the workers have a wellbeing dedication. The present research in Table 1.4 demonstrates defense and climate.

Table 1.4 Company safety culture

protection concerns in the present research in Table 1.5.

Table 1.5.involvement of senior management in safety

e. Responsibilities

HSE management is a line responsibility that requires active involvement of all management and oversight levels. Individual HSE duties and obligations, mission and aim, as listed below, are discussed with individuals for practice. The protection manager's duties are displayed in Table 1.5 in the current job.

Table 1.5 Responsibility of project manager on safety Table 1.5 (continued)

is outlined in Table 1.6.

Table 1.6 Responsibility of safety officer

Table 1.6 (continued)

Section / Area In-charges

The section / area roles for the ongoing research are listed in Table 1.7.

Table 1.7 Responsibility of section / area in-charges on safety

Table 1.8 Responsibility of all employees in organization on Safety Site Engineers

Table 1.9 demonstrates the roles of the site engineer in this series of research.

Table 1.9 Responsibility of site engineer on safety

Project IISE Committee Members

The duties of the HSE committee leader of the project; Table 1.10 indicates the ongoing research.

Table 1.10. Responsibility of project HSE committee member on safety

Subcontractors / vendors / Providers / Third Parties that provide the Project Services. The Project Subcontractor‘s duty in the present job arc of Table 1.11

Table 1.11 Responsibility of subcontractors on safety

ii. Safe work =died

A Safe Work Method (SWIM) is a document containing: • List the forms of construction work being undertaken at elevated risk • Specifies dangers and threats correlated with health and safety • Describes the management of the risk. And then • Describes the application of risk management interventions.

Work permit system

Via Working Permit Schemes, appropriate protection measures against defined hazards are planned and arranged for the execution of such safety measures in order to guarantee stable job efficiency in the specified workplace. The following schemes for job authorization will be considered • Near room job • Hot job done at the specified location. • Granting fitness approval. • Allow blowing. • Industrial Radiography results. • Overhead friction line job. • P&M and other electricity powered machines are awoken. • Electrical operation (high voltage (111)1 ILTI low voltage). iv. Screening and recruitment of employees all prospective staff are screened before they are involved in the workplace, i.e., the diagnostic examination. Their limes and previous knowledge are checked to see if they are suited to a specific mission. The safety engineer provides new staff health training, including information regarding specific threats and associated steps. Health engineer It guarantees correct citizens to operate and sell properly.

v. Equipment anew certification

The equipment shall have historical certificates and the required authorization for the third party (if appropriate) during activation of the equipment. The dimension of the bad features should be tested before implementation at this location.

vi. Training

A safety management feature is an essential part of instruction. Personnel preparation requirements are defined and preparation matrix configured as seen. The curriculum changes will be carried out periodically or according to the training plan. • Breast of health at height. • Public protection (e.g. drilling, franking, concreting, etc.). • Secure forms of erection and mounting. • Plant and equipment health in service. • Gas cutting and welding protection. • Scraper protection. • Fire protection and control. • Secondary support. • Safety of energy. • Security control and security infrastructure update.

vii. Pep Calk

Jobs are made conscious of the possible risks in the work by means of pep talks before they begin every job. We are demonstrated through operating procedures and different precautions. It alerts them about the dangers involved and trains them for appropriate measures. Project mechanics and service technicians hold pep talks. The company will still have sufficient contact open. The management of the top level will take part in all the promotional activities in the field of defense, in order to pass the knowledge Iron. In critical activities, lob risk analysis or a safe method of work is prepared. The boss will be contacted by engineers. Workers alms to bring their minds to work. Cascading any ILSE message down the line is essential for the success and the adoption of the following technique by all staff in every IISE management system. The successful defense coordination techniques in Table 1.12.

Table 1.12 Effective communication strategies on safety

ix. Sub-contractor management

Key Safety Performance Indicator (KSPI) is the instruments that can clearly show the position of sub-contractors in terms of health. The main protection success measure tests the management of the sub-contractor for health. y. Plan of Emergency Action A plan for various fire-like emergencies has been developed. Emergencies in the medical sector. Structural failure, the natural catastrophe, etc ... this can contribute to an immediate response plan and management liability. (xi) Personal protection and safety equipment (PPE) The least preferred method of safeguarding staff from danger is often identified as personal protective equipment (PPE). This is not to be employed where other measures have failed to eliminate or separate the risk. "Against dangerous substances or energies.

CONCLUSION

Within this analysis for the construction industry, a new comprehensive construction protection

Indian construction industry factors is needed. It work has also introduced a modern general comprehensive protection control paradigm for building sites exclusively. In this study, the proposed design paradigm would slash the rates of injuries (ie. overall structures health management scheme) in the construction industry. i. It is a clear model: if all the precautions are taken, the incident risk on construction sites will be that. Overall, this holistic approach to safety management should boost construction site protection efficiency.

REFERENCES

1) Brent C. Brenner (2009). "Occupational Electrical Injury and Fatality Trends and Statistics: 1992-2007". IAEI Magazine. 2009. Retrieved from website http:/Avwwiaei.org/magazine/2009/05/ocamational-electrical-injury-and-fatality-trends-and-statistics-1992%E2%80%932007/ 2) Brown. R.L. and Holmes H. (1986). The use of a factor-analytic procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model". Accidents Analysis and Prevention. Vol. 18. No. 6. pp. 455-470. 3) BS 8800 (1996). "Guide to health and safety management systems". British Standards Institution. p.40. 4) Carter. C.D. (1997). "Doing quantitative psychological research: from design to report". Psychology Press. UK, p. 125. 5) Chi. C. Chang. T., Ting. H. (2005). ―Accident patterns and prevention measures for fatal occupational falls in the construction industry". Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 36. pp. 391-400. 6) Chia-Fen chi. Chong-Cheng Yang Zheng-Lun Chen (2009). "In-depth accident analysis of electrical fatalities in the construction industry". International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 635-644. 7) Clark and Adler (2010). ―An Invitation to Social Research: How It‘s Done". Cengage Learning. USA. 8) Clark. P.L.V. and Creswell. J.W. (2011). "Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research". SAGE Publications. London. 9) Coble. R.J. and Haupt T.C. (1999). "Construction safety in developing countries: council for research and innovation in building and construction(CIB) Working commission W99.Honolulu. pp. 903-908. 10) Cooper. D. and Schindler. P. (2001). ―Business research methods" 7th edition. McGraw Hill Irwin. 2001.

Corresponding Author MD Moizuddin*

Research Scholar, Kalinga University, Raipur