A Study on Swachh Bharat Mission and Its Financial and Economic Impacts in India

INTRODUCTION

Week sanitation keeps on altogether affecting the country all in all. The fecal – oral chain, as communicated in Figure 1 keeps on adding to huge dreariness and mortality in India. Sanitation as a hindrance for the fecal – oral chain has a significant human advancement job. Different scientists and field contemplates keep on creating proof of the linkages between helpless sanitation and unfriendly health through illnesses like loose bowels, typhoid and intestinal sickness. In 2014 alone, there were 600 million grown-up cases, and 300 million instances of the runs in kids under 5 years old in India; Of the last mentioned, 300,000 deaths were accounted for in2014 alone (RGI, 2014). The relationship be tween‟s open poop and hindering in youngsters, inferring the predominance of lack of healthy sustenance brought about by the powerlessness to assimilate and hold supplements (with its lasting unfavorable effect on the psychological improvement of kids), is by and large progressively underscored in exploration and writing. Various sanitation contemplates have attempted to extensively set up and gauge the linkages among sanitation and economic pointers at the household, community and national levels. A generally cited study assessing the economic effect of deficient sanitation in India (WSP 2008), had discovered that the absolute economic effects of lacking sanitation in India added up to Rs. 2.44 trillion out of 2006, which was what might be compared to 6.4 percent of India's GDP at that point. This set out the per individual yearly effect at Rs. 2,180 because of helpless sanitation. Graph 1: Open Defecation in India contrasted with different areas of the World (%)

According to the Census of India, 2011, the rural population was 833.4 million (up from 743 million of every 2001), making the rural population of India million rural households didn't approach toilets and were pooling in the open, and 3.25 million rural households‟ utilized public or community restrooms. In any case, even in the households which approached toilets, just some were utilizing improved pits or septic tanks for capacity and treatment of the waste. While in certain territories treating the soil happens, there is expanding proof that a larger part of these enhanced site frameworks are not upheld up by, and nor do they approach improved pit or septic tank departure and transport frameworks, which could prompt natural defilement. There is no information from the Census on squander the board facilities and courses of action and the area depends on recounted and regularly dated data. This should be adjusted so that getting ready for the strong and fluid waste administration area can be improved.

According to the Census of India, 2011, the urban population was 377 million (up from 286 million of every 2001). Be that as it may if the population of legal towns alone was to be thought of, and the registration towns which are represented as rural zones are barred, at that point the urban population in 2011 was 322 million. The legal town's urban population of India was 31.1 percent of its absolute population. In 2011, there were 78.8 million households living in urban zones. In 2011, as indicated by Census show that 9.96 million (counting registration towns) urban households pooed in the open, and 4.74 million urban households utilized public or community toilets. The status in regard to the urban poor, particularly those living in ghettos was recorded to be much more vulnerable. In urban zones as well, even in the households which approached toilets, just 35.9 percent of the households were associated with a sewerage framework, and as revealed by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) in 2010, the all-out introduced limit on Class I and Class II urban communities addressed simply 10 to 11 percent of the general waste water produced in urban India. This suggests that near 90% of the waste water being released, is untreated and causes climate contamination along these lines making health dangers for the population. While the urban population has likewise been depending fundamentally "on location" septic tanks, (for example roughly 36.8 percent of the population), other than at squander water treatment plants there are no independent Fecal Sludge Treatment plants. As on account of rural India, there is restricted, and, best case scenario, recounted information on Solid and Liquid Waste Management (SLWM) facilities which should be associated for better long haul arranging. Various treatment alternatives for Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) at the decentralized and the concentrated level are It should anyway be remembered that the Swachh Bharat Mission, is just one of the instruments being utilized to improve sanitation. The enunciation that sanitation ought to be associated with public health is a significant and amazing one, as it likewise interfaces straightforwardly to all residents and carries the health result to the front. This accentuation is additionally significant as it expresses the way that if toilets and sanitation infrastructure alone are given, it won't be sufficient to arrive at the ideal result. The result of improved public health through sanitation will necessitate that all form, utilize and keep up these facilities reliably. The Prime Minister's accentuation on SBM as a group's development, and the way that it's result cannot be accomplished by government functionaries alone, additionally highlight the part of partners past government alone, particularly the occupants everywhere to meet this vision.

This segment of the report depicts and presents the consequences of a general model which has been created to address a couple of fundamental inquiries concerning the Swachh Bharat objective of the public authority. A portion of this are – what is the by and large assessed capital expense prerequisite for Swachh Bharat in urban and rural regions? What are the related working expenses for the resources and infrastructure made through this normal capital speculations? What are the different wellsprings of funding conceivable the capital and tasks costs? Which areas of the business would see most effect because of the execution of Swachh Bharat objective? What amount would this effect be regarding current volumes in every one of these business? What could be the degrees of assessed sway on financial and general health results of the general public all in all? The Swachh Bharat level headed as talked about in the prior segment is passed through two lead programs being run all the while by the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation and the Ministry of Urban Development.

Other than this there are various different projects run by various Ministries at the national level that are additionally expected to add to the Swachh Bharat target like the Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) run by the MoUD, plans of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, plans of the Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation among others. The greater part of these projects anyway center just around the capital expense prerequisites. Given this situation this report is the primary endeavor to build up an incorporated generally speaking quote for the goal of a Swachh Bharat objective. In creating and examining this model inquiries regarding which organizations ought to be engaged to guarantee legitimate tasks? What will arise as the job and degree of mediations from state governments, neighborhood governments and the private area normally emerge, and are driving inquiries which should be talked about, discussed and characterized as we push ahead towards the goal of a Swachh Bharat. The assessment practice depends on various suppositions. Right off the bat it accepts that the assets, foundations and interest for the Swachh Bharat objective is or will be set up soon. It puts together itself with respect to genuine expenses (not those accepted in the SBM rules) as given by specialized specialists at current costs. The assessed numbers are in 2015-16 costs. The specialized frameworks are viewed as incorporated among urban and rural territories quite far. It depends on existing examinations on both industry size in influenced areas too in assessing the financial and general health impacts.

India's attention on sanitation policy has followed the direction of international accentuation on sanitation policy. During the International Water and Sanitation Decade (1980-90), India dispatched the Integrated Low-Cost Sanitation (ILCS) Scheme (1980) and the Central Rural Sanitation Program (CRSP) (1986). Focal Rural Sanitation Program was rebuilt in 1996, human asset improvement, and limit advancement exercises to expand mindfulness and request age for sterile facilities. The Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) was dispatched in 1999 to supplant the TSC. The emphasis here was on the standards of community-drove absolute sanitation (CLTS) in rural regions. Urban sanitation began accepting consideration solely after the Pune Declaration named "Arrangement of Universal Sanitation in Urban India" in 2004. The Declaration was trailed by the Water for Life Decade (2005-2015) and the International year of Sanitation in 2008. During the exact decade, Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Scheme (JNNURM) was dispatched in 2005 and the National Urban Sanitation Policy (NUSP) in 2008. NUSP sets out a dream where: "Every single Indian city and towns become completely cleaned, healthy and decent and guarantee and support great general health and ecological results for every one of their residents with an uncommon spotlight on sterile and moderate sanitation facilities for the urban poor and ladies" (MoUD, 2008:7). The current focal government has pulled together sanitation as a national advancement need. It dispatched Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) with two sub-missions, the Swachh Bharat Mission (Gramin) - (SBM (G)) and the Swachh Bharat Mission (Urban) - (SBM (U)) in October 2014, with the vision of guaranteeing a 'Perfect India' by October 2019. A few components of sanitation are additionally remembered for the Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) 2015-2019 implied for 500 bigger urban communities. Aside from the nodal services of Urban Development (MoUD), Drinking Water and Sanitation (MoDWS); Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW); Human Resources Development (MoHRD); and Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation(MoWR) have additionally outfitted their endeavors to help improve sanitation. This solid center has over and over been underscored, focused on, and driven by the Prime Minister in various significant public discourses.

Sonali Bhattacharya, Dipasha Sharma and Pooja Sharma (2018 ) study evaluates the effort of Swachh Bharat Mission(SBM)1 plan, an integrative health plan considering difference across the conditions of India regarding positioning of urban areas in the primary study directed by the Quality Council of India (QCI) named 'Swachh Sarvekshan'. To evaluate the effect of financial elements and geological dissimilarity on the execution of the activity, the investigation utilized relapse examination and investigation of difference (ANOVA). Neatness scores of urban areas were asset for the health activity and education rates as markers of financial status alongside Geographical district and ideological group administering as interceding factors. Experimental outcomes show that the effort of SBM plan was not just influenced by the economic status of sub-national yet in addition by the geological area, Literacy rate. Schmidt (2014), helpless sanitation and cleanliness alongside wholesome lack prompts hindered development in offspring of India. It had affected at about 48% of kids constantly 2005–2006. Further, it actuates a gut issue called Environmental Enteropathy (EE) that redirects energy from development to battle against subclinical contamination (Schmidt, 2014). Hindered development influences kidneys, cerebrums and other inside organs. Helpless cleanliness and sanitation condition cause illnesses like typhoid, looseness of the bowels, cholera and polio. Hobson (2000) during her sanitation project in Pune, India saw that during the time of the examination, 41 casual settlements had no toilets. Unrefined toilets to individuals proportion was pretty much as low as 1 : 2500. Youngsters were required to poo in drain and not disturb the long lines around the unrefined toilets. The toilets apparently used to be cleaned once every day, and didn't maintain to the tension of the traffic. Frequently the zones around the toilets were covered with trash tossed in by the occupants. During the execution of the undertaking with assistance of the NGO, 'Asylum Associates' (Hobson, 2000), it was discovered that however there was noticeable eagerness from the metropolitan commission to help, yet fulfilling the time constraints of the ventures and administrative issues in actualizing the task were the obstacles. In metropolitan zones, another serious issue identified with health and tidiness, is the administration of strong waste (Sharholy et al., 2008). Consequently, it has been another center region of any general health program. It is generally disturbing, as the nation is endeavoring to turn out to be completely industrialized before the finish of 2020 (Sharma and Shah, 2005; CPCB, 2000; Shekdar et al., 1992). Giribabu Dandabathula, Pankaj Bhardwaj, Mithilesh Burra, Peddineni V. V. Prasada Rao, Srinivasa S. Rao (2019) has concentrate Enough proof exists to ascribe the event of diarrheal illness flare-ups because of open crap practice and hazardous sanitation strategies. Open crap empowers microorganisms like infection, microbes, and protozoa to taint people by methods for fecal–oral transmission strategies through polluted liquids, water, and fomites. To control the malefic impacts of open poo, the Indian government had started expert sanitation program to be specific Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) in 2014. SBM turned into the world's biggest toilet building activity. In excess of 95 million intense diarrheal infection (ADD) flare-ups over a long term period with accentuation on changes because of the structure of toilets under the spotless India crusade. Techniques: Weekly ADD flare-ups information from national level Integrated Disease Surveillance Program somewhere in the range of 2010 and 2018 were utilized for pattern investigation alongside the quantity of toilets built in provincial regions under SBM from the year 2014. Results: ADD episodes were investigated from 2010 to 2018. The quantity of ADD episodes each year during the previous 2 years (i.e., 2017 and 2018) of SBM system was lesser than at whatever year during the examination time frame. Occasional varieties during the long periods of May, June, July, and August record for 55%–60% of ADD flare-ups in any of the years; yet for 2018, the all-out episodes were 46%, which is essentially lower than that of ordinary scope of flare-ups in the pinnacle season. Anoop Jain, Ashley Wagner, Claire Snell-Rood and Isha Ray(2020) this examination utilized ethnographic techniques to investigate viewpoints on open poo and restroom use, and the financial and political explanations behind these viewpoints, in rustic Bihar. We draw on experiences from social the study of disease transmission and political nature to investigate the underlying determinants of toilet possession and use. Despite the fact that scientists have frequently highlighted rustic occupants' inclination for open crap, we found that individuals knew about its numerous dangers. We additionally found that (I) while sanitation examination and "conduct change" crusades frequently conflate the hesitance to receive restrooms with an inclination for open poop, this is an incorrect conflation; (ii) an appropriation can help (a few) households to build toilets however the measure of the sponsorship and the way of its dispensing are vital to its convenience; and (iii) broad disdain towards what numerous rustic inhabitants see as an advancement predisposition against country territories supports doubt towards the public authority in general and its Swachh Bharat Abhiyan-subsidized lavatories specifically. These social-primary clarifications for the lethargic take-up of sanitation in provincial Bihar (and possibly somewhere else) merit more consideration in sanitation exploration and advancement endeavors.

1. To examination Household financial viewpoint – including just household clinical spending. 2. To discover Household economic viewpoint, considering.

article dependent on Secondary sources like books, diary, articles, discourses, audits, research reports, and so on Subsequently, an examination configuration was true government measurements on socioeconomics and economic factors, the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) of 2015-16, different studies announcing sickness rates and mortality and exploration contemplates (sway assessments) detailing decreases in illness rates coming about because of sanitation.

SBM absolute ventures are the amount of what the household in addition to the public authority has financed, in addition to some other associations working in the field. In numerous examples, households and local area individuals contribute neglected time, or another organization, for example, a NGO gives upholds.

Cash and time spent by households on activities and support is key for the working of toilets and hand washing infrastructure. Figure 4 presents these expenses, in view of 9,082 reacting households. Financial expenses each year are INR 1,745 (US $27) for the toilet and INR 612 (US $9)for cleanser. Financial expenses incorporate materials for cleaning and paying for others to deal with cleaning. Given the majority of the toilets built under SBM are still generally new, it is far-fetched that the expenses of support and exhausting are reflected in the numbers. The significant expense is non-financial in nature at INR 6,082 (US $94) per household each year, assessed as the hour of household individuals in cleaning the toilet. Yearly estimation of time spent working the household toilet shifts from INR 4,189 (US $65) for less fortunate households to INR 8,650 (US $134) for more extravagant households.

Notwithstanding immediate toilet and hand washing costs, a few households pay for different expenses for SBM-advanced sanitation exercises, appeared in Figure 5. 87.8 percent of households expressed that they burned through cash on tidiness and waste administration rehearses. The amount of exercises is assessed at INR 725 (US $11) per household each year, going from INR 520 (US $8) yard or house, trailed by charges paid to the GP. What's more, 98% of households say they invest their own energy on these exercises. At the point when time is esteemed at the country wage, the expenses to households are INR 7,862 (US $122) for standard clearing of the yard and house, INR 1,236 (US $19) for removal of strong waste, INR 515 (US $8) for removal of wastewater and INR 1,968 (US $30) for removal of creature excreta.

For those 69.5 percent of households saying they got backing to assemble their toilet, the larger part either organized it themselves (42.4 percent) or they had the toilet constructed straightforwardly by an administration project worker (46.6 percent). A more modest extent had the materials or the work gave free to the household, or backing was gotten from a non-administrative association. Regardless of whether the household fabricated or had worked by the public authority was profoundly corresponded with the wealth status, as demonstrated in Figure 6. For those accepting a money sponsorship, 82% got it after consummation of the toilet, 12.5 percent got the endowment both during and after development, 2.7 percent got every last bit of it during development and 2.6 percent got a few or every last bit of it before development. The fundamental methods of installment of money endowment was immediate exchange to bank (69.5 percent), a check (22.1 percent) and money (9.1 percent). The normal time between finishing the toilet and getting the installment was 3.3 months, with a middle of 2 months.

The essential guardians were found out if they recollect a gastrointestinal contamination of a household part, which was treated at a health office and for which the expenses of treatment could be reviewed. Of the 10,051 households met, 20.9 percent could review a case which they could report the expenses. Of these, 77% expressed there were at least 3 watery stools in a day, 47 percent recognized retching or sickness and 32 percent referenced stomach cramps. The normal term of the infection was 1.8 days, with a normal 1.34 visits for each case to a clinical office. Treatment looking for was prevalently in private offices in both outpatient care (69%) and inpatient care (57%). The extent of cases out of the whole example looking for care from government and private health offices are appeared by wealth quintile in Figure 8. A noticeable relationship is appeared between wealth quintile and utilization of private offices for outpatient care, while for inpatient care it is less clear (with the exception of the most extravagant quintile).

of deaths were assessed dependent on death rates because of helpless sanitation and cleanliness from the WHO Global Burden of Disease study, anticipated decreases in deaths because of less diarrheal and other infection scenes, and the economic worth related with deflecting passing. The economic expenses and economic additions are appeared in Figure 12. The normal estimation of deaths because of WASH-related illnesses is INR 35,244 (US $546), shifting between INR 31,000 (US $481) and INR 40,000 (US $620) among wealth quintiles. The distinction in these qualities is because of a somewhat higher number of small kids in less fortunate households, wherein age bunch the dangers of mortality are most noteworthy.

Households were gotten some information about the deficiency of time because of treatment chasing and the deficiency of time spent at home due to being sick, with questions recognizing the patient and the carer. Respondents to the inquiries about clinical uses were likewise posed about the time spent heading out to and remaining at the clinical offices. A normal of 13.5 long stretches of patient time and 16 hours of carer time was spent looking for any sort of clinical consideration per sickness case41. More persistent time was lost from gainful exercises at home, while there was moderately less carer time as the patient didn't generally should be tended to. A sum of 67.8 long periods of season of household individuals was lost during a normal sickness scene, esteemed at INR 1,502 (US $23). Figure 13 shows the estimation of time spent wiped out from therapy chasing and time spent debilitated at home, per ailment case.

Figure 15 presents the assessed yearly economic additions remembering the time savings for sanitation access in addition to the beneficial time acquires dependent on decrease in number of sickness cases. The economic additions are INR 24,646 (US $382) at 100% toilet utilization and INR 20,200 (US $313) at 85% toilet use. The yearly gains at 100% toilet use range from INR 21,466 (US $333) for most unfortunate households to INR 28,614 (US $444) for most extravagant households.

Drawing on the assessed all out number of households without improved sanitation broadly in 2015 (from the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Program), the all-out economic damages are The harm cost as an extent of GDP is higher than the gauge of 6.4 percent from the past World Bank study since this current examination draws on field contemplates, which have recognized higher clinical and time costs than recently announced. The possible economic advantages of sanitation and cleanliness estimates executed under the SBM are huge. In the event that the inclusion and utilization of toilets would be 70% cross country, the harm costs would be INR 7.3 trillion (US $113 billion) or 4.7 percent of GDP, and henceforth the savings would be in the request for INR 4.9 trillion (US $76 billion). On the off chance that SBM accomplished its point of finishing open poo, with improved sanitation, the harm expenses would be decreased to INR 4.1 trillion (US $64 billion), or 2.7 percent of GDP, which means savings of INR 8.1 trillion (US $126 billion) from the current circumstance. The damages don't completely vanish under 100% toilet use rate since this degree of sanitation intercession isn't relied upon to mean the finish of the transmission of looseness of the bowels and different sicknesses through the fecal-oral course. To lessen the health impacts further, further developed water, sanitation and cleanliness infrastructure and practices would be required.

Costs and benefits are looked at throughout a 10-year time-frame, including speculation, tasks and upkeep

Other economic estimates shed further light on the exhibition of the intercession. The annual internal rate of return (IRR) on the financial venture is 32% for all population gatherings, which is well above what households would bring in from placing their cash into a bank investment account. For the most unfortunate households, the financial IRR is higher at 69%. Considering the full expense of the toilet – for example adding the public authority financial commitments – the normal financial IRR is 18% for all households and 24 percent for more unfortunate households. The net financial profit from the household consumption on the toilet and handwashing station midpoints INR 21,390 (US $332) more than 10 years. The normal financial recompense period is two years for all households, and just a single year for the more unfortunate households. When figuring advantage cost proportions under states of real toilet utilization (of 85% on normal from the whole example), the advantages are changed downwards utilizing the sums appeared in Table 16, and the expenses continue as before. The sum by which the advantages surpass costs lessens likewise to 1.1 occasions (from the household financial viewpoint) and 3.4 occasions (from the cultural point of view). For the least fortunate quintile, the household financial reserve funds surpass costs by 1.6 occasions.

The outcomes are moderately strong to changes in suppositions. At the point when the social rebate rate event nine from the more extensive economic points of view. At the point when health externalities are expected the family financial BCR diminishes from 1.7 to near 1.1, yet when no externalities are accepted it diminishes less, to 1.5. At the point when treatment looking for is decreased to just 50% of cases, the financial BCR diminishes to 1.3. Nonetheless, when the gauge pace of diarrheal illness cases per individual each year are divided, the BCR diminishes underneath 1.0 (from the family financial viewpoint). In the event that the toilet goes on for a very long time prior to being supplanted, the BCR increases to 2.3 (from the financial point of view) and 5.0 (from the cultural viewpoint).

Taking everything into account, this examination has shown that the Swachh Bharat Mission (Gramin) is exceptionally cost-gainful from both a financial and an economic point of view. Indeed, even family units that contribute INR 16,000 (US $248) of their own cash in a toilet and handwashing station will see those assets reimbursed in a long time from the clinical costs saved. The financial recompense period could be sooner given that some disinfection related sicknesses were excluded from the investigation, like Hepatitis An and E, soil-sent helminths and enteropathy. Youth hindering and its results on long haul health and educational results were likewise excluded from this investigation, however would add extensively to the advantages of buying and utilizing a toilet. Be that as it may, when family individuals don't utilize their toilet and they poo in the open, the advantages can be decreased significantly, consequently stressing the significance of strengthening conduct change segments of the SBM(G). The positive consequences of the SBM are complex;. From improved expectations for everyday comforts, to better health status, expanded economic profitability, climate insurance, underscored. Endeavors to catch observing markers in such manner don't appear to be sufficiently pushed. While the obligation regarding usage of SBM rests with the states and nearby organizations, it is broadly recognized, in writing and by specialists, that the necessary abilities and abilities to convey the order are perhaps going to be a critical requirement. The arrangement for strengthening capacities with respect to compelling execution at state and nearby levels for making the framework, and in this way the tasks and support of the offices, needs genuine idea.

[1] Aggarwal, A. & Kapur, A. (2017). Budget briefs. Swachh Bharat Mission (G), Volume 9/ Issue 1. New Delhi: Accountability Initiative, Centre for Policy Research. [2] Dasgupta, S., Ramaswamy, D.T.V.R., Noronha, K. & Bhol, A. (2015). Swachh Bharat: industry engagement – Scope & examples (SCI-FI: Sanitation Initiative, Research Report). New Delhi: Centre for Policy Research. [3] Giribabu Dandabathula, Pankaj Bhardwaj, Mithilesh Burra, Peddineni V. V. Prasada Rao, Srinivasa S. Rao (2019) Impact assessment of India‟s Swachh Bharat Mission – Clean India Campaign on acute diarrheal disease outbreaks March 2019 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 8(3): pp. 1202-1208 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_144_19 ,p.1202 [4] Jain, Wagner, Claire Snell-Rood and Isha Ray(2020)” Understanding Open Defecation in the Age of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan: Agency, Accountability and Anger in Rural Bihar” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, pp. 1384; doi:10.3390/ijerph17041384 ,www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph [5] Kaul, K. (2015). Social exclusion in the context of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. Yojana, 59 (1), pp. 51- 54. [6] Kumar, K. U. & Rajendran. S. (2016). A study on water and sanitation facilities in higher schools in Salem District, Tamil Nadu. Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics and Research, 5(6), pp. 21-30. doi:10.17010/aijer/2016/v5i6/107519 [7] Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Government of India. (2017a). MIS report, Swachh Bharat Mission (G). Retrieved from http://sbm.gov.in/sbmReport/home.aspx Retrieved from http://sbm.gov.in/sbmdashboard/IHHL.aspx [9] Ministry of Finance, Government of India (2018). Union expenditure budget 2018-19. Retrieved from https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/ [10] Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. (2015). Swachhta guidelines for public health facilities. New Delhi: GoI. [11] Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India. (2018a). Swachh Bharat Mission - urban dashboard. Retrieved from http://swachhbharaturban.gov.in/dashboard/ [12] Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India. (2018b). Swachh Bharat Mission (urban) guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.swachhbharaturban.in:8080/sbm/content/writereaddata/SBM_Guideline.pdf [13] Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India. (2018c). Mission budget, target, allocation and fund release, Swachh Bharat Urban. Retrieved from http://swachhbharaturban.gov.in/sanction.aspx?id=4waqwy44rnut4500&encryptdata=eK991SygGmVmo7/dzDB04fgwIYaSLGxwSAxQriaW56DKX6bbhDWzDK6PZIqiw5wK7E904HZJzrF1M2wbjTWFoe3NrjZOW8kG3dTH7FNIIX0= [14] Rajagopala, D. (2017, January 10). World Bank yet to release fund for Swachh Bharat. The Economic Times. Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/banking/finance/world-bank-yet-to-release-fund-for-swachh-bharat/articleshow/56429289.cms [15] Thakur, P. (2017, December 27). 25% of Swachh Bharat cess hasn‟t reached dedicated fund. The Economic Times. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/25-of-swachh-bharat-cess-hasnt-reached-dedicated-fund/articleshow/62259934.cms [16] Water and Sanitation Program. (2011). Economic impacts of inadequate sanitation in India. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en

[17] Sonali Bhattacharya, Dipasha Sharma and Pooja Sharma (2018). “Swachh Bharat Mission: An integrative approach to attain public health in India”; Symbiosis Centre for Management and Human Resource Development, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Int. J. Environment and Health, Vol. x, No. X, XXXX [18] https://www.unicef.org/india/media/1206/file/ Financial-and-Economic-Impacts.pdf. [19] https://www.cprindia.org/sites/default/files/ events/Swachh%20Bharat-Industry%20Engagement%20Report.pdf

M.A., PhD (Economics), Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University of Social Sciences, MHOW (MP) District-Indore bansal.prem1@gmail.com