Invasive Plants and Weeds: A Threat to Biodiversity and Agriculture in Shamli

The Impact of Invasive Plants and Weeds on Biodiversity and Agriculture in Shamli

by Rakesh Kumar*,

- Published in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, E-ISSN: 2230-7540

Volume 18, Issue No. 2, Mar 2021, Pages 91 - 96 (6)

Published by: Ignited Minds Journals


ABSTRACT

Weeds and invasive plants cause substantial losses to crop yields and quality, which directly affect food security and safety. According to reports approximately one-third yield losses occur globally due to weeds, in which contribution of invasive noxious weeds is enormous. The eradication of these plants is a big challenge for developing countries like India. It is a need of present time to enumerate the invasive plants and weeds of popular crops, so that concrete steps may be taken to eradicate these harmful plants. Considering above, a preliminary survey of invasive plant species and weeds of Shamli district of Uttar Pradesh was conducted and was found a total richness of 161 species belonging to 108 genera and 39 families. Most of these alien species (57.14 ) were introduced from tropical America including South and North America, followed by tropical Africa and other parts of Africa (17.39). Maximum number of species were reported from the family Asteraceae (31), followed by Papilionaceae (13) Amaranthaceae (12), Solanaceae and Poaceae with 10 species each. The data revealed that invasive plant species and weeds are becoming threat to the native flora and crops as they colonize rapidly and replace native species.

KEYWORD

invasive plants, weeds, biodiversity, agriculture, Shamli, crop yields, food security, eradication, developing countries, India

INTRODUCTION

Invasive plant species are the species which have deliberately or inadvertently introduced to a region, place or area where they don‘t grow naturally. They are endemic to one place or territory and affect the biodiversity of another place where they try to introduce (Shah et al. 2020). Due to interspecific competition invasive plant species restrict crop species to produce optimum yield of crops. Further, due to untimely and inadequate practice of weed control, a sizeable quantity of agriculture produce is also lost each year. Weeds not only cause substantial losses in crop yield but also degrade the quality of agricultural produce. The loss of yield may vary from crop to crop and can be associated to various agro-ecological factors. According to estimates, approximately one-third yield of plant products is lost globally (Bruce 2012) and weeds are the major contributors to these losses. Singhal (2008) reported that approximately 900 billion crop losses per annum is caused by insect pests, diseases and weeds In India. Reports reveal that weeds and invasive species can cause 46.2 to 61.5% loss in rice, wheat and maize while insect and pests can cause 27.3 to 33.7% of actual losses (Oerke 2006). Zhang (2003) reported that weeds can reduce from 12.3 to 16.5% of average crop yields in China. Observations reveal that in the initial years, some weeds like parthenium start growing in the undisturbed and open non-agricultural areas, but gradually it encroached into agricultural lands and drastically affects the crops like Sorghum (Das 2002). Parthenium an annual herb, has higher growth rate in comparison to other weeds and tend to become perennial (Tadesse et al. 2010 a & b). According to the definition given by International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) invasive species are foreigner species, which become established in habitat having favorable climatic conditions and threatens native biodiversity. These invasive species spread very fast and can be distributed throughout the world. The BLM (Bureau of Land Management, U.S.) considers plants invasive if they have been introduced into an environment far from the region of their evolution. As a result, they hardly found natural enemies to limit their growth and reproduction (Westbrooks 1998). The problem of invasive plants has been the matter of great concern at the national as well as international level (Maheshwari and Paul 1975, Nair 1988, Drake et al. 1989, Pandey and Parmar 1994, Huxel 1999, Meyer 2000, Mooney and Hobbs 2000, Almeilla and Freitas 2001, Hall 2003, Kohli et al. 2004, Cox 2004, Sharma et al. 2005, Raghuvanshi et al. 2005, Khuroo et al. 2007, Negi and Hajra 2007, Reddy 2008, Qian et al. 2008, Khanna 2009, Beena Kumari 2009, Joshi and Rawat 2011, Chandra Sekar 2012, Chandra Sekar et al. 2012, Gaur and Rawat 2013, Rastogi et al. 2015, Arvind Singh 2015, Wagh challenge in developing Asian countries, especially in India. It is a need of time to enumerate the invasive plants and weeds of popular crops, so that concrete steps may be taken to eradicate these harmful plants. The steps taken in this direction will definitely help in conserving valuable biodiversity. Considering above facts, a preliminary survey of invasive plant species and weeds of Shamli district was conducted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Area

Shamli (formerly Prabudh Nagar) is a district in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. This district was carved out from Muzaffarnagar District on 28 September 2011 as Prabudh Nagar and renamed Shamli in July 2012. Shamli is the headquarters of the district. Shamli is located approximately 100 kilometres from Delhi along the Delhi–Saharanpur highway. The district lies in the fertile Doab region and hence the major occupation is agriculture. Shamli is located at 29.45°N 77.32°E. It has an average elevation of 248 metres (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Maps of Study Area

In the course of investigation during 2017-2018 and 2018-2019, the entire district was frequently surveyed. Several attempts were made for collection and study in different seasons in different botanically interested localities like Kairana, Shamli, Kandhala, Jhinjhana, Unn, Chausana, Banat etc. During field trips plants were collected from different localities like roadsides, gardens, parks, and cultivated lands of Sugarcane, Rice, Wheat, Barley, Jowar, etc. Efforts were made to collect specimens in flowering and fruiting stage and collected in polythene bags. The collected plants were processed, preserved and mounted on herbarium sheets following the standard herbarium techniques (Jain and Rao 1978). The dried specimens were identified by consulting different deeds and literatures (Kanjilal 1928, Duthie 1903-1929, Gupta 1961, Maheshwari 1963, Babu 1977,

Enumeration

All the invasive plant species have been enumerated in Table 1. Botanical name of each species is tabulated followed by family name, habit, name of the native place (origin), category and propagation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The present study is an effort to enlist weed and invasive plant species of Shamli district. Total 161 species belonging 108 genera and 39 families are documented in Table 1. Dicots are dominant and represented by 143 species under 96 genera from 33 families and monocots by 18 species under 12 genera and 6 species (Fig. 3). Most of these invasive species (57.14 %) were introduced from tropical America including South and North America, followed by tropical Africa and other parts of Africa (17.39%). The study area lies under sub-tropical region, so, the plants native to tropical regions found this area suitable for their vigorous growth. Maximum number of species were reported from the family Asteraceae (31), followed by Papilionaceae (13) Amaranthaceae (12), Solanaceae and Poaceae with 10 species each (Fig. 1). Herbs accounted for 125 species, shrubs 22 species, climbers and grasses represented 7 species only (Fig. 2). Perhaps this is the first report in Shamli district, because no significant piece of literature is available so far mentioning information on these lines. More recently Malik (2015) has enlisted the flora of district Muzaffarnagar including district Shamli but he conducted his work before partition of district Muzaffarnagar. Some of the species observed during current study are similar to the report of Malik (2015). It has been observed that few species like Parthenium hysterophorus, Lantana camara, Ageratum conyzoides, Tridax procumbens, Ipomoea carnea, Cannabis sativa and Chenopodium murale are highly invasive and have invaded not only the non-agricultural area but agricultural fields also. In addition, these species have been noticed interfering and replacing the natural flora of this region. Therefore, further detailed studies are required to assess their direct and indirect impact on agricultural crop yield.

CONCLUSIONS:

From the outcome of present study, it can be concluded that Shamli district in Uttar Pradesh state of India hosts a large variety of weed and invasive plant species dominated by Asteraceae, Papilionaceae, Amaranthaceae, Solanaceae and Poaceae families. In the survey of Shamli district, it has been found that the exotic plant species were

Majority of invasive plant species comes under herbs. Most of the reported species are naturalized but some are interfering and noxious also. There is an urgent need to take necessary steps to control invasion in new areas so that biodiversity and crop losses may reduce.

Table 1. List of weeds and invasive plant species reported from Shamli district of Uttar Pradesh. Fig.1. Representation of various families in species diversity of Shamli district. Fig.2. Representation of various habit forms in reported plant species Fig.3. Representation of Monocots and Dicots in Families, Genera and Species

REFERENCES:

Almeilla ID and Freitas H. (2001). The exotic and invasive flora of Portugal. Bot. Complutensis, 25: pp. 317-327. Arvind Singh (2015). Observations on the Flora of Varanasi District in Uttar Pradesh State of India. Global Journal of

Babu CR (1977). Herbaceous Flora of Dehradun. CSIR, New Delhi. Balakrishan NP, Chakarbarty T, Sanjappu M, Lakshminarsimhan P and Singh P. (2012). Flora of India, vol-23, Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata. Beena Kumari (2009). Alien invasive plant species of district Moradabad (UP), India. Plant Archives, 9(2): pp. 723-724. Bruce TJ (2012). GM as a route for delivery of sustainable crop protection. Journal of Experimental Botany 63: pp. 37-41. Chandra Sekar K. (2012). Invasive Alien Plants of Indian Himalayan Region- Diversity and Implication. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 3(2): pp. 177–184. Chandra Sekar K, Manikandan R and Srivastava S K. (2012). Invasive Alien plants of Uttarakhand Himalaya. Proceeding of the National Academy of sciences, India section B: Biological Sciences, 82(3): pp. 375–383. Cox GW (2004). Alien Species and Evolution: The Evolutionary Ecology of Alien Plants, Animals, Microbes and Interacting Native Species. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Das TK (2002). How to tackle weed invasion in crops. ICAR News 8: pp. 12. Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves R, Kruger F, Rejmanek M and Williamson M (eds.). (1989). Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Duthie JF (1903–1929). Flora of the Upper Gangetic plain and of the adjacent Siwalik and Sub- Himalayan tracts. Calcutta, 3. Gaur T and Rawat DS (2013). Diversity, nativity, flowering phenology and invasive alien species of Asteraceae in Pantnagar. Pantnagar Journal of Research, 11(3): pp. 409–416. Gupta RK (1961). Flora of district Muzaffarnagar in the doab of rivers Ganga and Yamuna. J. Bombay Nat Hist Soc., 58(3): pp. 749-775. Hall J. (2003). Southern Africa: Alien plant species invade region. Inter Press Service, Norway. Hill MP, Coetzee JA, Martin GD, Smith R, Strange EF (2020). Invasive Alien Aquatic Plants in South South Africa. Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, Vol. 14. Springer, Cham. Hooker JD (1876). The Flora of British India. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, India. Huxel GR (1999). Rapid Displacement of Native Species by Invasive Species: Effects of Hybridization. Biological Conservation, 89: pp. 143-152. Jain SK, Rao RR (1978). A Handbook of Field and Herbarium Methods. Today and Tomorrow‘s Pub., New Delhi. Joshi, K and Rawat DS (2011). A Preliminary Investigation on Alien and Native Elements in the Flora of Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Indian Botanical Society, 90: pp. 66–74. Kanjilal UN (1928). Forest flora of Chakrata, Dehradun and Saharanpur forest division. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, India. Khanna KK (2009). Invasive Alien Angiosperms of Uttar Pradesh. An International Journal, 1(2): pp. 41-46. Khuroo AA, Rashid I, Zafar R, Dar GH and Wafai BA (2007). The Alien flora of Kashmir Himalaya. Biological Invasions, 9: pp. 269-292. Kohli RK, Dogra KS, Batish DR and Singh HP (2004). Impact of invasive plants on the structure and composition of natural vegetation of North-western Indian Himalayas. Weed Technology, 18: pp. 1296-1300. Maheshwari JK (1963). The flora of Delhi. CSIR, New Delhi. Maheshwari JK and Paul SR (1975). The Alien flora of Ranchi. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 72(1): pp. 158-188. Malik V. (2015). Herbaceous Flora of Muzaffarnagar District (U.P.). Sch. Acad. J. Biosci.: 3(2B): pp. 182-196 Meyer JY (2000). Preliminary review of the invasive plants in the Pacific islands. In: Sherley, G. (Ed.). Invasive Species in the Pacific: A Technical Review and Draft Regional Strategy. South Pacific Regional Mooney HA and Hobbs RJ (2000). Invasive Species in a Changing World. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Nair KKN (1988). Mikania micrantha H. B. K. – A noxious weed in the forests of Kerala. Evergreen, 20: pp. 13-14. Negi PS and Hajra PK (2007). Alien flora of Doonvalley, North west Himalaya. Current Science, 92(7): pp. 968-978. Oerke EC (2006). Crop losses to pests. The Journal of Agricultural Science 144: pp. 31–43. Pandey, RP and Parmar PJ (1994). The Alien flora of Rajasthan. J. Econ. Tax. Bot., 18(1): pp. 105-121. Panetta F and Gooden B. (2017). Managing for biodiversity: Impact and action thresholds for invasive plants in natural ecosystems. Neo Biota, 34: pp. 53-66. Qian Z, Yang R, Tang J and Xin Chen. (2008). Competitive interaction between the invasive Solidago canadensis and native Kummerowia striata in lead contaminated soil. Botanical Studies, 49: pp. 385-391. Raghuvanshi AS, Rai LC, Gaur JP and Singh JS (2005). Invasive Alien species and biodiversity in India. Current Science, 88(4): pp. 539-540. Raizada P. (2007). Invasive species: The concept, invasion process and impact & management of invaders. Environews, 13(3): pp. 07-09. Rastogi J, Rawat DS and Chandra S. (2015). Diversity of invasive alien species in Pantnagar flora. Tropical Plant Research, 2(3): pp. 282–287. Reddy CS (2008). Catalogue of Invasive Alien Flora of India. Life Science Journal, 5(2): pp. 84-89. Shah K, Tiwari I, Tripathi S, Subedi S, Shrestha J. (2020). Invasive alien plant species: a threat to biodiversity and agriculture in Nepal. Agriways, 8(2): pp. 62-73. DOI:10.38112/agw.2020.v08i01.008. Sharma GP, Singh JS and Raghubanshi AS (2005). Plant invasions: Emerging trends and future implications. Current Science, 88(5): pp. 726-734. Singhal S. (2008). The imperative of crop protection for farmers. (In) Agriculture for Food Security and Rural Growth, pp. 139-57. V. Dhawan Tadesse B, Das TK and Yaduraju NT (2010a). Comparative growth analysis of Parthenium and other weeds in sorghum ecosystem. Indian Journal of Weed Science 42(1 & 2): pp. 73–6. Tadesse B, Das TK and Yaduraju NT (2010b). Effects of some integrated management options on Parthenium interference in sorghum Weed Biology and Management 10: pp. 160–9. Thapa S, Chitale V, Rijal SJ, Bisht N. and Shrestha B. B. (2018). Understanding the dynamics in distribution of invasive alien plant species under predicted climate change in Western Himalaya. PloS one, 13(4), pp. e0195752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195752. Wagh VV and Jain AK (2015). Invasive alien flora of Jhabua district, Madhya Pradesh, India. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 7(4): pp. 227–237. Westbrooks R. (1998). Invasive plants, changing the landscape of America: Fact book. Federal Interagency Committee for the Management of Noxious and Exotic Weeds (FICMNEW). Washington, DC. Zhang ZP (2003). Development of chemical weed control and integrated weed management in China. Weed Biology and Management 3: 197–203.

Corresponding Author Rakesh Kumar*

Assistant Professor, Department of Botany, Vijay Singh Pathik Government (PG) College, Kairana, Shamli, UP