A Pilot Research Assessing the risk of Musculoskeletal Discomforts among Physiotherapists caring for Patients with Neurological Conditions

The neuro-paediatric department of S undertook an observational pilot research. One of the most prevalent complaints relating to employment is musculoskeletal diseases (MSDs). They cost companies billions of euros and have an impact on millions of workers throughout Europe. Managing MSDs raises productivity and enhances quality of life. Having physiotherapy sessions with specialised physiotherapists is one of the most popular practises.[1] Despite a substantial body of research on the effects of multiple sclerosis (MSDs), the need to address them, and strategies for doing so, there appears to be a research vacuum about MSDs that physiotherapists encounter. There is a very broad writing accessible about MSDs in the medical care area however minimal accessible information explicitly for the calling of physiotherapists, while no comparable review has at any point been acted in Greece.[2] Nonetheless, there are a few clear hardships in carrying out such a groundwork. It has been accounted for that physiotherapists tend not to report their wounds through the laborers' pay framework. Besides, countless those are working in a confidential work on, underrating their own gamble factors.[3-5] In that sense, official measurements don't give an unmistakable image of word related injury in physiotherapists. Past exploration has recognized high occurrence paces of MSDs to physiotherapists. For example, Chung et al., (2013) [6] played out an overview among physiotherapists in the province of Victoria, Australia and found that business related torment or distress had been capable by 91% of respondents, [6] recognized a frequency of 61% of business related outer muscle issues among exercise based recuperation moves on from the College of Iowa, USA.[6] Most business related MSDs foster over the long run. As a rule, there is no single reason for MSDs; in any case, different elements work in blend [7-11]. As indicated by the European Organization for Wellbeing and Wellbeing at Work (OSHA) the most widely recognized actual causes and hierarchical gamble elements of MSDs incorporate [12-14]:

• Load Handling , especially when bending and twisting

 Repetitive or forceful movements environments

• Fast-paced work

• Prolonged sitting or standing in the same position

Accordingly, the utilization of manual treatment procedures, [15] for example, rub was related with wrist and hand side effects. Age is likewise thought to be as an element. [16] tracked down that more seasoned respondents (north of 50 years of age) had the most minimal pace of business related wounds. [17-20] found that most respondents' side effects showed up before the age of 30 81 and in somewhere around five years of graduation. Employers bear significant expenditures from musculoskeletal problems due to worker's compensation, higher health care, disability, and absenteeism, as well as decreased productivity. Cases of MSDs are more serious than the typical nonfatal sickness or injury [21-25].

• For all nonfatal injury and sickness cases in 2001, the median duration of absence from work due to MSDs was 8 days, whereas the median duration for occupational skin disorders such dermatitis, eczema, or rash was 6 days.[26]

• Three age categories—those in the 25–34, 35–44, and 45–54 year old ranges—accounted for 79% of instances.

• A greater proportion of white, non-Hispanic workers were impacted than female workers.

• 58% of the MSD cases were related to workers, operators, fabricators, and laborers as well as those in technical, sales, and administrative support professions.

• Together, the industrial and services business sectors were responsible for almost half of all occurrences of mental illness.

• In the US, musculoskeletal diseases are responsible for around 70 million physician office visits each year and an estimated 130 million overall health care contacts, including hospital, ER, and outpatient visits [27]

• In 1999, around a million individuals missed work to treat and recuperate from musculoskeletal discomfort or upper extremity or low back function impairment connected to their jobs.\

• The Institute of Medicine estimates that the yearly economic cost of WMSDs, as determined by missed earnings, compensation expenditures, and productivity losses, is between $45 and $54 billion [28]

• Lifting, pushing, tugging, holding, carrying, or tossing an item are examples of overexertion injuries, which cost employers $13.4 billion annually, according to Liberty Mutual, the

The Saudi Arabian neuro-pediatric division oversaw an observational pilot research. Since the school does not support morality, the Chief's permission was obtained to spearhead the review. For the evaluation, a total of fifteen licensed physiotherapists who often treated patients with neurological tests were recalled. The members were asked for their oral consent before being included in the research. While treating patients, powerful cell cameras captured pictures of their positions. The Quick Whole Body Appraisal, or REBA, sheet was used to break down these positions. The best moment to support a lone position was noticed, as well as the occasions it was reiterated.

The REBA sheet provides insight into the risk factors that might lead to external muscle disorders in business. Together, the inspector may analyze the neck, trunk, upper, and lower limit poses. The bodily components are divided into two separate segments on the REBA sheet: segment B (arm and wrist investigation) and section A (examination of the neck, trunk, and legs). The sum of the attributes in the first section plus a power/load score is the total. Furthermore, the coupling/grasp score is added to the absolute of the attributes in section B. Score C is the sum of the absolute scores of segments An and B. To get the final REBA score, postures that are maintained and extra dreary actions (many times per instant), rapid, vast reach stance adjustments, or unstable bases added point C.

Using a REBA sheet, the likelihood of evaluating outer muscle issues was examined. The findings were divided into several groups based on the assumption that the score falls into the following ranges: 2-3 (low risk), 4-7 (medium risk), and 8-10 (high risk).

The positions resulting to scoring were organized into low to high bet of making business related external muscle issues.

2-3 Change may be needed (Low risk) 2 4-7 Further investigation change soon (Medium risk) 7 8-10 Investigate & implement change (High risk) 7

In this review, complete 15 members were available (6 male and 9 females), with a mean time of (24.00 ± 0.866). Table 2: Gender of the Participant

Male 6 female 9 was completed with evaluation and calculation based on the body posture. Based on district-specific data, the amount of probability for the following areas is reviewed: neck location (44.4%), trunk (22.2%), legs (22.2%), upper arm (11.1%), lower arm (55.5%), and wrist (22.2%). As seen in Figure 3 and Table 3. Table 3: REBA Scoring

Negligible risk 0 0 Low risk 2 11 Medium risk 7 45 High risk 6 40 Very High risk 1 4

The evaluation of outer muscle distress among physiotherapists really focusing on patients with neurological circumstances uncovers a huge word related wellbeing concern. The pervasiveness of distress in basic regions highlights the requirement for proactive measures to shield the prosperity of these medical care experts. Execution of ergonomic mediations, including legitimate gear and work area changes, arises as a pivotal technique to relieve the gamble of outer muscle issues. Also, tending to variables, for example, dull developments and deficient breaks during patient consideration meetings is fundamental for forestalling and overseeing inconvenience. Guaranteeing the actual strength of physiotherapists isn't just fundamental for their work fulfillment and life span in the calling yet in addition straightforwardly assets and preparing to improve ergonomic practices. Future examination ought to dive further into the drawn out impacts of outer muscle uneasiness on the vocation directions of physiotherapists and investigate creative answers for additional limit word related gambles in this urgent medical care area.

1. Aaron KA, Vaughan J, Gupta R, Ali N-E-S, Beth AH, Moore JM, et al. The risk of ergonomic injury across surgical specialties. PLoS ONE. (2021) 16:e0244868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244868 2. Farhang Dehghan S, Fallah Madvari R, Akhlaghi Pirposhte E, Mohammad Hosseini A, Laal F. Musculoskeletal disorder and its correlation with the awareness of ergonomics factors in nurses working at some university hospitals, Tehran, Iran (2018). J Occup Health Epidemiol. (2019) 8:37–42. doi: 10.29252/johe.8.1.37 3. Milhem M, Kalichman L, Ezra D, Alperovitch-Najenson D. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among physical therapists: a comprehensive narrative review. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. (2016) 29:735–47. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00620 4. Epstein S, Sparer EH, Tran BN, Ruan QZ, Dennerlein JT, Singhal D, et al. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among surgeons and interventionalists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. (2018) 153:e174947–e174947. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4947 5. Adegoke B OA, Akodu AK, Oyeyemi AL. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Nigerian physiotherapists. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. (2008) 9:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-112 6. Chung SH, Her JG, Ko T, Ko J, Kim H, Lee JS, et al. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Korean physical therapists. J Phys Therapy Sci. (2013) 25:55–9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.25.55 7. Passier L, McPhail S. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders amongst therapists in physically demanding roles: qualitative analysis of risk factors and strategies for prevention. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. (2011) 12:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-24 8. Ahmad MM, Khan L, Niazi MN, Fatima H. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders 9. Nordin NAM, Leonard JH, Thye NC. Work-related injuries among physiotherapists in public hospitals-a Southeast Asian picture. Clinics. (2011) 66:373–8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000300002 10. Obembe A, Onigbinde A, Johnson O, Emechete A, Oyinlola M. Occupational injuries among physical therapists in South-West, Nigeria. Niger J Med Rehabil. (2009) 13:25–30. doi: 10.34058/njmr.v13i1.2.38 11. Glover W, McGregor A, Sullivan C, Hague J. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders affecting members of the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Physiotherapy. (2005) 91:138– 12. Chen CY, Lu SR, Yang SY, Liang FW, Wang JJ, Ho CH, et al. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among physical therapists in Taiwan. Medicine. (2022) 101:e28885. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028885 13. Franco G, Fusetti L. Bernardino Ramazzini's early observations of the link between musculoskeletal disorders and ergonomic factors. Appl Ergon. (2004) 35:67–70. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2003.08.001 14. Sadeghi Naeini H, Kaviani Z, Karuppiah K, Sadeghi M. Prevention of occupational traumas by developing an ergonomic design and modifying farmers' postures in walnut gardens of Tuyserkan, Iran. Arch Trauma Res. (2020) 9:24–9. doi: 10.4103/atr.atr_48_19 15. Armijo PR, Flores L, Pokala B, Huang C-K, Siu K-C, Oleynikov D. Gender equity in ergonomics: does muscle effort in laparoscopic surgery differ between men and women? Surg Endosc. (2022) 36:396–401. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08295-3 16. Neumann J, Angrick C, Roth AJ, Neumuth T. Ergonomic assessment of operating room setups for orthopedic reconstructive surgery. In: 18. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Computer und Roboter-assistierte Chirurgie (CURAC). Reutlingen (2019).

18. Yoopat P, Pitakwong P, Vanwonterghem K. Assessing the physiological strain of physical therapists according to work experience: a cross-sectional study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. (2020) 24:253–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.05.033 19. Zhang Q, Xie Q, Liu H, Sheng B, Xiong S, Zhang Y, et al. pilot study of biomechanical and ergonomic analyses of risky manual tasks in physical therapy. Int J Ind Ergon. (2022) 89:103298. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103298 20. Hignett S, McAtamney L. Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Appl Ergon. (2000) 31:201–5. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039-3 21. INSST: NTP. 601: Evaluación de las Condiciones de T rabajo: Carga Postural. Método REBA; Instituto de Seguridad e Higiene del Trabajo: Madrid, Spain (2001). 22. Okuyucu K, Hignett S, Gyi D, Doshani A. Midwives' thoughts about musculoskeletal disorders with an evaluation of working tasks. Appl Ergon. (2021) 90:103263. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103263 23. Hernández CO, Li S, Astudillo RJ, Rodríguez IM. What affects musculoskeletal risk in nursing assistants and orderlies? Work. (2022) (Preprint):1–11. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210651 24. Rafeemanesh E, Jafari Z, Kashani FO, Rahimpour F. A study on job postures and musculoskeletal illnesses in dentists. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. (2013) 26:615–20. doi: 10.2478/s13382-013-0133-z 25. Carneiro P, Martins J, Torres M. Musculoskeletal disorder risk assessment in home care nurses. Work. (2015) 51:657–65. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152024 26. Tölgyessy M, Dekan M, Chovanec L. Skeleton tracking accuracy and precision evaluation of Kinect V1, Kinect V2, and the azure kinect. Appl Sci. (2021) 11:5756. doi: 10.3390/app11125756 27. Manghisi VM, Uva AE, Fiorentino M, Bevilacqua V, Trotta GF, Monno G. Real time RULA assessment using Kinect v2 sensor. Appl Ergon. (2017) 65:481–91. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.02.015 28. Plantard P, Shum HPH, Pierres A-SL, Multon F. Validation of an ergonomic assessment method using Kinect data in real workplace 29. Reyes-Zárate GG, Garcia-Cavazos I. Ergonomic assessment using kinect. Int J Inform Technol Secur. (2020) 12:13–22.

Physical Therapist, Armed Forces Center For Health Rehabilitation, Taif City -Saudi Arabia