Literary Criticism in Indian English Literature: A Case Study of M. K. Naik

Exploring the Evolution and Classification of Literary Criticism in Indian English Literature: The Case of M. K. Naik

Abstract

A short prologue to history of criticism is to be given at the beginning. At that point the sign of the word „Literary Criticism‟ alongside the beginning and advancement of Literary Criticism must be inspected. There are numerous manners by which criticism might be grouped. There are some major critical hypotheses, for example, mimetic, down to business, expressive, and objective. One regular polarity for criticism is Aristotelian versus Non-romantic. Aristotelian criticism infers a legal, intelligent, formal criticism that will in general discover the estimations of a work either inside the work itself or indistinguishably connected to the work whereas Platonic criticism infers a moralistic, utilitarian perspective on workmanship, where the estimations of a work are to be found in the convenience of craftsmanship for other and nonartistic purposes. Further the grouping of Criticism is finished by the reason that it is expected to serve for example to legitimize, to portray, to translate, to pass judgment, to find different literary and its pertinent viewpoints.