Clinical and Radiological Evaluation and Comparison of Bioresorbable Barrier Membrane with Allograft and Alloplastic Bone Graft Material in Treating Grade II Mandibular Furcation Defects: A Case Report

Comparison of Bioresorbable Barrier Membrane with Allograft and Alloplastic Bone Graft Material in Mandibular Furcation Defects

Authors

  • Dr. Niveditha Reddy Bezawada Santosh deemed to be University, Ghaziabad
  • Priyanka Aggarwal Santosh deemed to be University, Ghaziabad
  • Shweta Bali Santosh deemed to be University, Ghaziabad

Keywords:

Clinical and Radiological Evaluation, Bioresorbable Barrier Membrane, Allograft, Alloplastic Bone Graft Material, Grade II Mandibular Furcation Defects, Regeneration, Periodontal Disease, Bone Regenerative Material, Autogenous Materials, Alloplastic Materials, Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Grafts (DFDBA), Hydroxyapatite (HA), Grade 2 Furcation Defect Management, Generalized Chronic Stage 2 and Grade 3 Periodontitis, Bone Graft Materials, Positive Outcomes, Bone Fill, DFDBA

Abstract

Regeneration of the bone loss as a consequence of periodontal disease can be achieved by using bone regenerative material, several autogenous and alloplastic materials are being used for the main purpose of reconstruction of osseous tissue in grade 2 furcation defects. There is paucity on published literature on demineralized freeze dried bone grafts (DFDBA) and hydroxyapatite (HA) in the management of grade 2 furcation defect management. A 45-year-old patient-reported pain in both the left and right lower back region of the jaw and want to get treated. The final diagnosis was Generalized chronic stage 2 and grade 3 periodontitis and bone graft materials were placed accordingly in the sites to be treated and there were positive outcomes in both sites with no significant difference when compared with each other. The use of both bone graft materials aids in bone fill, there are better results observed in site treated with DFDBA.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-01

How to Cite

[1]
“Clinical and Radiological Evaluation and Comparison of Bioresorbable Barrier Membrane with Allograft and Alloplastic Bone Graft Material in Treating Grade II Mandibular Furcation Defects: A Case Report: Comparison of Bioresorbable Barrier Membrane with Allograft and Alloplastic Bone Graft Material in Mandibular Furcation Defects”, JASRAE, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 3253–3257, May 2019, Accessed: Aug. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ignited.in/index.php/jasrae/article/view/11914

How to Cite

[1]
“Clinical and Radiological Evaluation and Comparison of Bioresorbable Barrier Membrane with Allograft and Alloplastic Bone Graft Material in Treating Grade II Mandibular Furcation Defects: A Case Report: Comparison of Bioresorbable Barrier Membrane with Allograft and Alloplastic Bone Graft Material in Mandibular Furcation Defects”, JASRAE, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 3253–3257, May 2019, Accessed: Aug. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ignited.in/index.php/jasrae/article/view/11914