Admissibility in a Court of Law of Illegally Obtained Evidence and the Right to Privacy

Examining the Impact of Legislative Safeguards on Admissibility of Illegally Obtained Evidence and the Right to Privacy in India

Authors

  • Dr. Ashok Kumar Kala

Keywords:

admissibility, illegally obtained evidence, right to privacy, safeguards, legislative safeguards, offender rights, victim rights, criminal cases, relevance criteria, unfairness, regulations, Indian Evidence Act, Law Commission, recommendations, practise

Abstract

When it comes to safeguarding an individual's right to privacy from unreasonable search andseizure inside the course of gathering evidence, India falls far short of legislative safeguards. Both theoffender and the victim have specific rights and safeguards in criminal cases. To be admissible, evidencemust now meet just one criteria be relevant. Certain cases may suffer from extreme unfairness becausethere are no regulations prohibiting the introduction of evidence that was acquired illegally. The LawCommission of India conducted a detailed study that proposed changes to the Indian Evidence Act.Despite this, the Law Commission's recommendations were never put into practise.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-01

How to Cite

[1]
“Admissibility in a Court of Law of Illegally Obtained Evidence and the Right to Privacy: Examining the Impact of Legislative Safeguards on Admissibility of Illegally Obtained Evidence and the Right to Privacy in India”, JASRAE, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1898–1902, Jun. 2019, Accessed: Sep. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ignited.in/index.php/jasrae/article/view/12491

How to Cite

[1]
“Admissibility in a Court of Law of Illegally Obtained Evidence and the Right to Privacy: Examining the Impact of Legislative Safeguards on Admissibility of Illegally Obtained Evidence and the Right to Privacy in India”, JASRAE, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1898–1902, Jun. 2019, Accessed: Sep. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ignited.in/index.php/jasrae/article/view/12491