Mindfulness and self-efficacy in improving moral judgement under Artificial Intelligence (AI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/d7ks7z44Keywords:
Frameworks, Intelligence, Technological and AnalysisAbstract
The contribution of mindfulness and self-efficacy in improving moral judgement under artificial intelligence (AI) governance is investigated in this work. Ensuring ethical technology use calls on leaders to combine technical developments with moral responsibility as artificial intelligence systems progressively affect important decision-making. Although mindfulness is becoming more and more popular in many spheres, its effects on difficult decisions in AI governance are yet little known. This paper looks at how self-efficacy, spiritual intelligence, and mindfulness support moral reasoning, openness, and responsibility in artificial intelligence governance. Using a secondary data analysis technique, policy studies, scientific literature, and AI ethics frameworks are analysed to find important themes in ethical consciousness, self-efficacy, and responsible AI management. The results imply that mindfulness improves attention in high-stakes decision-making, helps AI professionals clearly negotiate ethical conundrums, and stimulates innovation in handling ethical AI issues. Moreover, spiritual intelligence enhances integrity while self-efficacy helps people to boldly face moral dilemmas. Including these components into organisational training courses and AI ethics education would help to greatly increase ethical AI applications. Future studies aiming at developing globally flexible AI policy suggestions should investigate cross-cultural variations in mindfulness and self-efficacy.
References
V. John, B. Georgia, K. Nick, L. Vassilios, K. George, and A. Eleytherios, “Business and Marketing Ethics and Deontology : Ethical Dilemmas and Moral Strategic Decisions Introductory remarks : Corporate Social,” vol. 9, pp. 40–41, 2020, doi: 10.37421/ijems.2020.9.585.
M. L. Wellman, R. Stoldt, M. Tully, and B. Ekdale, “Ethics of Authenticity: Social Media Influencers and the Production of Sponsored Content,” J. Media Ethics Explor. Quest. Media Moral., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 68–82, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23736992.2020.1736078.
L. Ouchchy, A. Coin, and V. Dubljević, “AI in the headlines: the portrayal of the ethical issues of artificial intelligence in the media,” AI Soc., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 927–936, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00146-020-00965-5.
T. Hagendorff, “The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines,” Minds Mach., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 99–120, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8.
Part III: Harmonizing AI with Spiritual & Emotional Intelligence: A Path to Sustainable Success and Global Equity! | LinkedIn.” https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/part-iii-harmonizing-ai-spiritual-emotional-path-stephen-/ (accessed Jan. 27, 2025).
J. Y. Lee and C. H. Jin, “The role of ethical marketing issues in consumer-brand relationship,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 23, pp. 1–21, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11236536.
J. Tsalikis, “Can We Act Ethically? Implications of Determinism, Chaos Theory and Unintended Consequences,” Bus. Ethics Leadersh., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 6–13, 2018, doi: 10.21272/bel.2(2).6-13.2018.
P. K. Turyakira, “Ethical practices of small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries: Literature analysis,” South African J. Econ. Manag. Sci., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2018, doi: 10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1756.
D. G. K. Dissanayake, S. Perera, and T. Wanniarachchi, “Sustainable and ethical manufacturing: a case study from handloom industry,” Text. Cloth. Sustain., vol. 3, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s40689-016-0024-3.
B. Jiwani, “The Process of Ethics Consultation,” SpringerBriefs in Ethics, pp. 29–58, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-60376-6_2.
E. Challenges, “Ethical Challenges and Solutions of Generative AI : An,” pp. 1–29, 2024.
M. Ryan, N. De Roo, H. Wang, V. Blok, C. Atik, and M. Ryan, “AI through the looking glass : an empirical study of structural social and ethical challenges in AI,” AI Soc., no. 0123456789, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s00146-024-02146-0.
T. D. Cooper, “Leadership and Spirituality : The Relationship of Incorporating Spirituality in Ethical Workplace Decision Making Walden University,” 2023.
T. Ku and S. Samanta, “Impact of Spiritual Intelligence on Decision Making Style ; a Structural Equation Modeling Perspective Impact of Spiritual Intelligence on Decision Making Style ; a Structural Equation Modeling Perspective,” no. January, 2022, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4037665.
C. Santiago-torner and Y. Jiménez-pérez, “Impact of Ethical Leadership on Autonomy and Self-Efficacy in Virtual Work Environments : The Disintegrating Effect of an Egoistic Climate,” 2025.
R. Uppathampracha and G. Liu, “behavioral sciences Leading for Innovation : Self-Efficacy and Work Engagement as Sequential Mediation Relating Ethical Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior,” 2022.
M. Ryan and L. N. Bossert, “Dr. Doolittle uses AI: Ethical challenges of trying to speak whale,” Biol. Conserv., vol. 295, p. 110648, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2024.110648.
T. D. Cooper, “Abstract Leadership and Spirituality: The Relationship of Incorporating Spirituality in Ethical Workplace Decision Making”.
This work is licensed under a 