Neuro-Linguistic Programming As Advancement in Education and Learning
Keywords:
Neuro-Linguistic Programming, advancement, education, learning, theoretical base, Specialty, article, existing theories, transdisciplinary knowledge, learning theoryAbstract
In this paper we have portrayed the root of NLP and talked about its hypothetical base. While we acknowledge Specialty opening up banter about NLP, we have had cause to challenge quite a bit of her article. The first of Specialty's five fundamental focuses appears the most productive to banter about, particularly so as to position NLP in connection to existing hypotheses. Here our position is that NLP is positively mixed. What exactly degree it is intelligent, and whether it ought to be viewed as a hypothesis, an arrangement of models or a gathering of techniques, is open to wrangle about. We have proposed that NLP could be viewed as a type of transdisciplinary knowledge. As indicated by Art's typology, NLP seems to draw on every one of the three groupings of learning hypothesis.References
Bandler, R. and Grinder, J. (1975a). The structure of magic I: a book about language and therapy, (Palo Alto, California, Science and Behaviour Books)
Bandler, R. and Grinder, J. (1975b). Patterns of the hypnotic techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D. vol1., (Cupertino, California, Meta Publications)
Bandler, R. and Grinder, J. (1979). Frogs into princes, (Moab, Utah, Real People Press)
Bandler, R. and MacDonald, W. (1988). An insider’s guide to sub-modalities.
Beck, C. E. and Beck, E. A. (1984). Test of the eye movement hypothesis of neurolinguistic programming: a rebuttal of conclusions, Perceptual and Motor Skills58(1), 175-176
Craft, A. (2001). Neuro-linguistic programming and learning theory, The Curriculum Journal 12(1), pp. 125-36
Dilts, R., Grinder, J., Bandler, R. & De Lozier, J. (1980). Neuro-linguistic programming: volume 1, the study of the structure of subjective experience, (California, Meta Publications)
Dorn, F.J., Brunson, B.I. and Atwater, M. (1983). Assessment of primary representational systems withneuro-linguistic programming: examination of preliminary literature, American Mental Health Counsellors Journal 5(4), pp. 161-8
Einspruch, Eric L. and Forman, Bruce D. (1985). Observations concerning research literature on neuro-linguistic programming, Journal of Counseling Psychology 32 (4), pp. 589-596 20
Eisner, D. A. (2000). The death of psychotherapy: from Freud to alien abduction, (Westport, CT, Praeger)
Esser, M. (2004). La Programmationneuro-linguistique en débat: repèrescliniques, scientifiques et philosophiques (L'Harmattan, Paris)
Esser, M. (2004). La Programmationneuro-linguistique en débat: repèrescliniques, scientifiques et philosophiques (L'Harmattan, Paris)
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities, (New York, Basic Books)
Heap, M. (1988). Neurolinguistic programming - an interim verdict, in Heap, M. (ed) Hypnosis: current clinical, experimental and forensic practices, (London, Croom Helm) pp. 268-280
Knight, S. (2002). NLP at work: the difference that makes a difference in business, (London, Nicholas Brealey Publishing)
Sharpley, C. F. (1987). Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: 23 no supportive data or an untestable theory?, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(1), pp. 103 – 107
Stanton, H. E. (1994). Suggest ology and NLP: are there similarities?,Journal of Accelerative Learning and Teaching 19(3), pp. 241-56
Thompson J.E., Courtney, L. and Dickson, D. (2002). The effect of neurolinguistic programming on organizational and individual performance: a case study, Journal of European Industrial Training 26(6), pp. 292-8
Tosey, P. and Mathison, J. (2003). Neuro-linguistic programming and learning theory: aresponse, The Curriculum Journal, 14(3), pp. 361 – 378
Tosey, P., Mathison, J. and Michelli, D. (2005). Mapping transformative learning: the potential of neuro-linguistic programming, Journal of Transformative Education, 3(2). pp. 140 – 167
This work is licensed under a 