Man-Made Environmental Disasters: Who Bears the Economic Liability?

Exploring the Social Dynamics of Man-Made Environmental Disasters and Economic Liability

Abstract

This survey article inspects different sides of calamity that are characteristically important for human existence. From a social viewpoint, debacles can be isolated into two fundamental gatherings, specifically catastrophic events that are 'given' and calamities brought about by human exercises that don't regard the common habitat. The stewardship of nature is firmly identified with 1) human conduct, 2) perspective, 3) mindfulness, and 4) mindful. These four angles can be inspected from a social viewpoint which thusly will encourage another mindfulness for people as the occupants of the earth. 'Save the World' is a maxim that convinces people to defend the earth and the climate, while 'Man-Made Disaster' is a human judgment of some other gathering of people that have made natural harm that straightforwardly or by implication prompts debacle. The different sides of this marvel will be examined proportionally in this article, to see the ongoing idea wherein the social methodology can be a beneficiary of these two posts. As such save the world versus human-made catastrophe will be talked about from a social viewpoint.