Density functional theory investigation of reaction mechanisms and stereochemical outcomes

Authors

  • Chandra Kumar Prajapati Research Scholar, Shri Krishna University, Chhatarpur, M.P. Author
  • Dr. Shiv Brat Singh Associate Professor, Shri Krishna University, Chhatarpur, M.P. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29070/a5r3af67

Keywords:

Density Functional Theory, Reaction Mechanisms, Stereochemistry, Computational Chemistry, Catalysis, Chirality

Abstract

Density functional theory (DFT) is an influential computational technique that is common in studying the electronic structure, reaction pathways, and stereochemical products of chemical reactions. The current project concentrates on DFT use in determining reaction pathways, intermediates, transition states, and activation energies in a bid to learn about the kinetics and thermodynamics that control the chemical transformations. It also examines how stereochemistry, i.e. notions of chirality, enantiomers and diastereomers, can exclude or include certain chemical reactions. The paper states the computational protocols, basis sets, exchange-correlation functionals, catalyst modeling’s, and stereochemical control processes utilized in the theoretical studies. Moreover, the difficulties in stereo controlled synthesis and the even more general usability of stereochemistry in other areas, in particular, pharmaceuticals, materials science, agrochemicals, and biological systems, are mentioned. All in all, the combination of DFT-based calculation analysis and chemical theory provides a greater insight into molecular reactivity and stereochemical selectivity, which can be used to design a more efficient and selective chemical process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abbasoglu, R. (2006). Journal of Molecular Modeling, 12, 991.

2. Abbasoglu, R. (2007). Journal of Molecular Modeling, 13, 425.

3. Abbasoglu, R., Magerramov, A., & Asamaz, Y. (2009). Acta Chimica Slovenica, 56, 237.

4. Chiappe, C., Rubertis, A. D., Lemmen, P., & Lenoir, D. (2000). Journal of Organic Chemistry, 65, 1273.

5. Chiappe, C., Rubertis, A. D., Detert, H., Lenoir, D., Wannere, C., & Schleyer, R. P. (2002). Chemistry – A European Journal, 8, 967.

6. Chiappe, C., Pomelli, C. S., Lenoir, D., & Wattenbach, C. (2006). Journal of Molecular Modeling, 12, 631.

7. Diastereoselectivity – an overview | ScienceDirect Topics. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/diastereoselectivity

8. Gleiter, R., & Schafer, W. (1990). Accounts of Chemical Research, 23, 369.

9. Grimme, W., Wortmann, J., Frowein, D., Lex, J., Chen, G., & Gleiter, R. (1998). Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2, 1893.

10. Goldstein, M. J., & Hoffmann, R. (1971). Journal of the American Chemical Society, 93, 6193.

11. Herges, R., Papafflippopoulos, A., Hess, K., Chiappe, C., Lenoir, D., & Detert, H. (2005). Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 44, 1412.

12. Hoffmann, R., Imamura, A., & Hehre, W. J. (1968). Journal of the American Chemical Society, 90, 1499.

13. Hoffmann, R. (1971). Accounts of Chemical Research, 4, 1.

14. Hu, M., Yuan, Y. X., Wang, W., Li, D. M., Zhang, H. C., Wu, B. X., Liu, M., & Zheng, Y. S. (2020). Chiral recognition and enantiomer excess determination based on emission wavelength change of AIEgen rotor. Nature Communications, 11, 161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13955-z

Downloads

Published

2023-09-01