Main Article Content

Authors

Harsh Shrivastav

Dr. Sena Pati Shukla

Abstract

The employment of integral equation approaches has resulted in a revolution in the analytical and numerical treatment of boundary value concerns in the domains of elasticity and potential theory. This revolution has contributed to the advancement of these sciences. This research's objective is to offer a comprehensive account of the creation and use of integral formulations for the aim of resolving conventional concerns in a variety of fields of study. The article begins with basic similarities between linear elasticity and potential theory, and then on to cover major formulations within the field, such as Somigliana's identity and boundary integral approaches. An emphasis is placed on the benefits of reducing domain issues to boundary-only formulations, which provide computational efficiency, manage complicated geometries, and naturally integrate boundary conditions. These advantages are highlighted in the following sentence. There is a review of the significant contributions made by Betti, Somigliana, and Muskhelishvili, which is then followed by contemporary numerical implementations. In the last section of the paper, a discussion of difficulties and potential future paths is presented, with particular emphasis on nonlinear and three-dimensional situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

  1. Rizzo, F. J. (1967). An integral equation approach to boundary value problems of classical elastostatics. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 25(1), 83–95.https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/233622
  2. Muskhelishvili, N. I. (1953). Some Basic Problems of the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. Noordhoff, Groningen.[Originally published in Russian, foundational in complex variable methods and singular integral equations.]
  3. Love, A. E. H. (1944). A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity (4th ed.). Dover Publications.[Classic reference on elasticity theory.]
  4. Jaswon, M. A. (1963). Integral equation methods in potential theory I. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 273, 551–572.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1963.0074
  5. Jaswon, M. A., & Ponter, A. R. S. (1963). An integral equation solution of the torsion problem. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 273, 237–260.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1963.0054
  6. Titchmarsh, E.C (2019) Introduction to the theory of Fourier .1itegrals. Claredon Press, Oxford.
  7. relnikova, E., Choudhary, N., Choudhary, N., Degtyariov, K., Kriutchenko, D., Vierushkin, I. (2024). Boundary element method for hypersingular integral equations: Implementation and applications in potential theory. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 169, 105999.
  8. (Elsevier) (2024). Boundary element method for hypersingular integral equations (short communication).
  9. [Anonymous] (2023). A highly accurate indirect boundary integral equation solution for three-dimensional elastic wave scattering problems.
  10. ASME Applied Mechanics Reviews (2024). Recent Advances and Emerging Applications of the Boundary…
  11. Symm, G. T. (1963). Integral equation methods in potential theory II. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 275, 33–46.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1963.0140
  12. Banerjee, P. K., & Butterfield, R. (1981). Boundary Element Methods in Engineering Science. McGraw-Hill. [Modern engineering applications using BEM.]
  13. Brebbia, C. A., Telles, J. C. F., & Wrobel, L. C. (1984). Boundary Element Techniques: Theory and Applications in Engineering. Springer-Verlag.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02459-2
  14. Sladek, J., & Sladek, V. (1998). Singular integrals in boundary element methods. Computational Mechanics, 21, 295–309.https://doi.org/10.1007/s004660050284
  15. Bonnet, M. (1999). Boundary Integral Equation Methods for Solids and Fluids. Wiley.