Evaluation and Optimization of Performance Management Systems for Faculty in Technical Educational Institutions

Article Sidebar

PDF HTML
Published: Aug 1, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29070/6pf8sr78
Keywords:
Performance Management System, faculty evaluation, technical education

Main Article Content

Authors

Shalu Tiwari

Research Scholar, Shri Krishna University, Chhatarpur, M.P.

Dr. Rajendra Chaudhari

Assistant Professor, Shri Krishna University, Chhatarpur, M.P.

Abstract

Performance management systems (PMS) are vital for assessing and improving teachers' work. The main features, assessment methods, and difficulties of faculty PMS are discussed in this literature review. Core assessment measures include instructional efficacy, research output, industrial partnerships, and administrative responsibilities. Problems including unfairness, lack of openness, reluctance to change, and technical obstacles are examined. Optimization tactics are also included in the paper, including data-driven analytics, evaluation models based on artificial intelligence, and best practices from international organizations. A standardized yet adaptable PMS, a balance between qualitative and quantitative evaluations, and the incorporation of continual professional growth are the policy proposals centred on these issues. By fixing these problems, Institutions may create a performance assessment system that works better and lasts longer, serving both the Institution and its students better. In order to improve faculty performance management in technical education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2023): International Journal of Information Technology and Management (IJITM)

Section

Articles

References

  1. Upavasi, S. (2016). Job Analysis of Guest Faculties Working in the Government First Grade Colleges of the Karnataka State. Kaav International Journal of Economics, Commerce & Business Management, 3(3), 138-150.
  2. Wright, C. A. (2017). The faculty promotion and tenure handbook: A strategic guide for getting promoted. Rowman & Littlefield.
  3. Ferri-Reed, J. (2016). Faculty performance management: Legal and ethical considerations. In R. Palmer (Ed.), The Handbook of Conflict Resolution Education: A Guide to Building Quality Programs in Institutions (pp. 401-411). Jossey-Bass.
  4. Holsapple, C. W. (2016). Faculty performance in institutions of higher learning: A review of key performance indicators. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 56(4), 364-371.
  5. Mizak, D. L. (2015). Faculty performance management in higher education: Practices and principles. American Journal of Business Education, 8(3), 147-154.
  6. Marsh, H. W. (2017). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(2), 131-154.
  7. Palomba, C. A., & Banta, T. W. (2015). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education. Jossey-Bass.
  8. Rutledge, S. A. (2013). Performance management in higher education. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2013(157), 63-72.
  9. Singh, A., & Mane, P. (2018). A Systematic Study on Faculty Retention in the Education Sector (With Special Reference to Indore City. Kaav International Journal of Economics, Commerce & Business Management, 5(4), 126-132.
  10. Sharma, A. K., & Agarwal, K. (2018). How Faculty as Human Capital Resources Play Various Role in Educational Institutes and in Turn How Institutes Keep Them Motivated? -A Case Study on Trends Followed in Colleges of Delhi Univesity. Kaav International Journal of Economics , Commerce & Business Management, 5(1), 1039-1046.
  11. Thanh, N. T. L., & Tam, P. T. (2015). The Solutions Improving the Students’ Satisfaction of the Faculty of Business Administration and Foreign Trade at Lac Hong University in Dong Nai Province. Kaav International Journal of Law, Finance & Industrial Relations, 2(2), 33-42.
  12. Sing, M. R. R., & Vadivelu, S. (2016). Performance Appraisal in India–A Review. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11(5), 3229-3234.
  13. Begum, S., Sarika, K., & Sumalatha, G. (2015). A study on performance appraisal private sector vs. public sector. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 17(2), 75-80.
  14. Othman, N., Mokhtar, S. S. M., & Asaad, M. N. M. (2017). Quality Management System, Employee Satisfaction And Employee Performance In Private Higher Education Institutions: A Proposed Framework. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 7(6), 681.
  15. Global Education Monitoring Report (2017). Accountability in education: Meeting our commitments. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. ED/GEMR/MRT/2017/P1/7.