An investigation of the technical educational institutions' faculty members' performance management system in Jabalpur
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
To guarantee academic quality and professional growth, technical educational institutions' faculty performance management systems (PMS) are vital. This study examines the structure, execution, and influence on faculty performance of the PMS at technical institutes in Jabalpur to determine its efficacy. Data was gathered through interviews and questionnaires with administrators and faculty members as part of a mixed-methods study. Important problems highlighted by the research include insufficient evaluation standards, little chances for professional advancement, and few channels for feedback. The results indicate that open and honest evaluation procedures, ongoing professional development, and faculty participation in systemic decisions are essential components of a high-quality PMS. The research shows that in order to improve institutional efficiency, governmental measures are needed to boost faculty performance. Some of the suggestions include creating an assessment system that is more inclusive and focused on growth and using current performance appraisal methods. Possible directions for future investigation include comparing data from other Indian states.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
References
- Amundsen, C., Abrami, P., McAlpine, L., Weston, C., Krbavac, M., Mundy, A., & Wilson, M. (2015). The what and why of faculty development in higher education: An in-depth review of the literature. AERA.- The Support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada (SSHRC).
- Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103–116.
- Kim, K. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education. Educause Quarterly, 29(4), 22–30.
- Bhatnagar, K., Srivastava, K., & Singh, A. (2010). Is faculty development critical to enhance teaching effectiveness? Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 19(2), 138–141.
- Jalaliyoon, N., & Taherdoost, H. (2012). Performance evaluation of higher education: A necessity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5682–5686.
- Al Jardali, H., Khaddage-Soboh, N., Abbas, M., & Al Mawed, N. (2021). Performance management systems in Lebanese private higher education institutions: Design and implementation challenges. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 11(2), 297–316.
- Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Centeno, A., Dolmans, D., Spencer, J., Gelula, M., & Prideaux, D. (2016). A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Medical Teacher, 28(6), 497–526.
- O'Sullivan, P. S., & Irby, D. M. (2011). Reframing research on faculty development. Academic Medicine, 86(4), 421–428.
- Acharya, B. S. (2011). Human Resource management;Emerging concepts, challenges and applications. Bhotahity Kathmandu: Ashmita Books Publishers & Distributors (P)Ltd.
- Acharya, B. S. (2015). Foundation of Human resource management. Bhotahity, Kathmandu: Ashmita books publishers & distributors (P) Ltd.
- Afful, K. (2012). Effective Management in the South. Kathmandu: Ekta Books.
- Armstrong, M. (2012). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page.
- Bhattacharya, S. (2015). Faculty Performance Management in Technical Institutions: A Case Study. Indian Journal of Educational Management, 6(2), 34-40.
- Mukherjee, S., & Sahu, S. (2017). Performance Management Systems in Technical Education: Models and Frameworks. Journal of Management and Education, 21(2), 23-38.
- Kumar, R. (2016). Challenges in Implementing Performance Management Systems in Educational Institutions. Journal of Educational Administration, 14(3), 91-105.