The Study on Earthquake and their impact on Structural Engineering

Article Sidebar

PDF HTML
Published: Mar 1, 2021
Keywords:
Earthquakes, Geologic Earthquake Effects, Seismic Design, Earthquake Resistant Buildings

Main Article Content

Authors

Narendra Narayan Koli

Student, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan University, Bhopal, M.P.India

Dr. Jyoti Yadav

Professor, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan University, Bhopal, M.P.India

Abstract

In earthquake, a tremendous quantity of energy is released in the form of seismic waves, which are then communicated to structures via their foundations, causing them to vibrate. The reaction acceleration will be nearly equivalent to the peak ground acceleration for constructions with a very short time period (high frequency). . The creation of creative design concepts to safeguard civil engineering structures from harm, including material contents and human occupants, from the hazards of strong winds and earthquakes is one of the key difficulties facing structural engineers in the current decade. Tall building analysis and design are often undertaken using more advanced approaches and methodologies because each tall building represents a major investment. Furthermore, most building codes are designed without special consideration for tall buildings, which account for a very small percentage of development activity in most areas. As a result, structural engineers and academics who want a better knowledge of the design and performance of these modern megacity landmarks must comprehend new approaches to seismic analysis and design of tall buildings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021): Journal of Advances in Science and Technology (JAST)

Section

Articles

References

  1. AASHTO 2010, ‘guide specification for seismic isolation design’, American Association of State Highway and Transportation officials, third edition, Washington DC.
  2. Abbas Moustafa 2012, ‘Earthquake Resistant Structures-Design, Assessment and Rehabilitation’ Intec, Chapters published February 29, under CC BY 3.0 license.
  3. Agrahara Krishnamoorthy 2010, ‘Seismic isolation of bridges using variable frequency and variable friction pendulum isolator system’, Structural Engineering International, vol-2, pp. 178-184.
  4. Akhaveissy, AH & Abbassi, M 2014, ‘Pushover Analysis of Unreinforced Masonry Structures by Fiber Finite Element Method’, Journal of Research in Civil and Environmental Engineering, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 96-119.
  5. Alaa Barmo, Imad H. Mualla, & Hala T. Hasan 2015, ‘The Behavior of Multi-Story Buildings Seismically Isolated System Hybrid Isolation (Friction, Rubber and with the Addition of Rotational Friction Dampers)”, Open Journal of Earthquake Research, vol. 4, pp. 1-13.
  6. Anastastasia Athanasiou, & Nicholas D.Oliveto 2011, ‘Modelling hybrid base isolation system for earthquake response simulation’, International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering.
  7. Anil Baral & Yajdani, SK 2015, ‘Seismic Analysis of RC Framed Building for Different Position of Shear wall’, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 3346-3353.
  8. Anil K Chopra 2007, ‘Dynamics of Structures: Theory and application to earthquake engineering’, 3rd Ed., Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
  9. Anitha M & Divya K.K 2015, ‘Study On Seismic Behavior Of Knee Braced Steel Frames’, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology vol. 02, no. 06,
  10. Aravind Ashok 2011, ‘Difference between Seismic and Wind Loads’, www.sefindia.org/forum/files/difference_between_wind_and_seismic_f orces_110.pdf.
  11. Ashish, S, Agrawal & Charkha, SD 2012, ‘Effect of change in shear wall Location on storey drift of Multistorey Building Subjected to Lateral Loads’, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 2, no. 3, pp.1786-1793.
  12. Avtar Pall & Tina Pall, R 2004, ‘Performance-based Design Using Pall Friction Dampers - An Economical Design Solution’, Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, paper no. 1955.
  13. Avtar S. Pall & Cedric Marsh, 1982, ‘Seismic Response of Friction Damped Braced Frames’, Journal of the Structural Division, vol. 108, no. 6, pp.1313-1323.
  14. Azlan, A & Suhana, S 2008, ‘Comparison on the effect of earthquake and wind loads on the performance of reinforced concrete buildings’, Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China.
  15. Bakker, J. F. J. 1935, ‘Balance Block of Buildings’. US Patent No. 2014643.
  16. Black, CJ, Makris, N & Aiken, I 2004, ‘Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces’, Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 880-894.
  17. Chandurkar, PP & Pajgade, PS 2013, ‘Seismic Analysis of RCC Building with and Without Shear Wall’, International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 805-1810.
  18. Chang, H.Y. & Chiu, C. K. 2011, ‘Performance Assessment of Buckling Restrained Braces’, The Twelfth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction, Procedia Engineering 14, pp. 2187–2195.
  19. Chang, KC, Soong, TT, Oh, ST & Lai,ML 1995, ‘Seismic behaviour of steel frame with added viscoelastic dampers’, Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 121, no. 10, pp. 1418-1426.
  20. Chong-Shien Tsai. 2012, ‘Advanced base isolation systems for lightweight equipment’s’, Intec, Chapters published February 29, under CC BY 3.0 license.
  21. Chopra, AK & Goel, RK 2002, ‘A Modal Pushover Analysis Procedure for Estimating Seismic Demands for Buildings’, Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 561-582.