Main Article Content

Authors

Shilpa Jain

Dr. Anuj Bhadauriya

Abstract

As a result of its efficacy and extensive application, there are a range of biological therapeutic approaches available today. The vast majority of dairy waste is biodegradable, has an unpleasant odour, and contains a substantial quantity of oil. The contamination of water by untreated dairy waste led to the spread of several diseases among humans and animals. Because of this, it is probable that the majority of currently functioning dairies utilise activated sludge-based treatment facilities. The nutritional content of dairy effluent cannot be eliminated using this method of treatment. Dairy effluent has sufficient nutrients for biological growth, and biological treatment approaches are believed to be more successful and economical. The processing of milk and other dairy products generates foul-smelling effluent due to the presence of a substantial amount of organic materials. This wastewater also contains a notable quantity of COD and BOD. The growth in human population has resulted in a rise in the amount of water contamination. Concerns over the diverse types and amounts of garbage that are created and deposited into natural water sources have led to the implementation of new regional water quality regulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

  1. Bala Kumar, TSS & Nehru Kumar, V 2012, Performance evaluation of mbr for treating dairy effluent‘, International Journal for Research in Science & Advanced Technologies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50-52.
  2. Henze, M, Gujer, W, Mino, T & Van Loosdrecht, MCM 2011, Activated sludge models: ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3‘, Scientific and Technical Reports., no. 9, IWA, London, UK.
  3. Deng, L, Guo, W, Ngo, HH, Zhang, X, Wang, XC, Zhang, Q & Chen, R 2016, New functional biocarriers for enhancing the performance of a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system‘, Bioresource Technology, vol. 208, pp. 87-93.
  4. Ahmed, Z, Cho, J, Lim, BR, Song, KG & Ahn, KH 2010, Effects of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and microbial community structure in a membrane bioreactor‘, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 287, no. 2, pp. 211-218.
  5. Iorhemen, O, Hamza, RA & Tay, JH 2016, Membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology for wastewater treatment and reclamation: Membrane fouling‘, Membranes, vol. 6, no. 2, P. 33.
  6. Eldyasti, A, Andalib, M, Hafez, H & Nakhla, G 2011, Comparative modeling of biological nutrient removal from landfill Leachate using a circulating fluidized bed bioreactor (CFBBR)‘, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 187, no. 1-3, pp. 140-149.
  7. Castillo, S, Zapico, A, Doubrovine, N, Lafforgue, C & Fonade, C 2014,Study of a compact bioreactor for the in-line treatment of dairy wastewaters: Case of effluents produced on breeding farms‘, Desalination, vol. 214, no.1-3, pp. 49-61.
  8. Gao, DW, Fu, Y, Tao, Y, Wu, MW, An, R & Li, XX 2011, Current research and development of controlling membrane fouling in MBR‘, Journal of Biotechnology., vol. 8, pp. 2993-2998.
  9. Javed Iqbal Qazi, Muhammad Nadeem, Shagufta Baig, S, Shahjahan Baig & Quratulain Syed 2011, Anaerobic fixed film biotreatment of dairy wastewater‘, Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 590-593.
  10. Leyva-Díaz, JC, González-Martínez, A, González-López, J, Muñío, MM & Poyatos, JM 2015, Kinetic modeling and microbiological study of two- step nitrification in a membrane bioreactor and hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor–membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment‘, Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 259, pp. 692-702
  11. Ferrai, M, Guglielmi, G & Andreottola, G 2010, Modelling respirometric tests for the assessment of kinetic and stoichiometric parameters on MBBR biofilm for municipal wastewater treatment‘, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 626-632.
  12. Keerthi, Vinduja, V & Balasubramanian, N 2014, Electrocoagulation- integrated hybrid membrane processes for the treatment of tannery wastewater', Environtal Science and Pollution Research, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 7441-7449.
  13. Mannina, G & Cosenza, A 2013, The fouling phenomenon in membrane bioreactors: Assessment of different strategies for energy saving‘, Journal of Membrane Science., vol. 444, pp. 332-344.
  14. Buntner, D, Sánchez, A & Garrido, JM 2016, Feasibility of combined UASB and MBR system in dairy wastewater treatment at ambient temperatures‘, Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 230, pp. 475-481.