Main Article Content

Authors

Mr. Desai Sandeep Tukaram

Dr. U. J. Phatak

Abstract

Most construction projects use cast-in-place concrete, in which the wet mixture is poured andformed directly at the construction site. Since this often takes place on a construction site, the term sitecast concrete has become the standard. An analogy is drawn to the usage of precast concrete, in whichpieces are cast off-site and then transported to the construction site. Concrete for on-site casting isoften delivered using the iconic revolving-barrel concrete mixer trucks. In a centralized batching plant,where stricter quality control over the components may be maintained, the mixture is prepared. At everystage of the process—from transport to the site to proper mixing in the truck to unloading anddepositing in the forms and handling for placement, finishing, and curing—the level of responsibility andcompetence exercised by the people involved is vital. Extreme steps may need to be taken to ensureclose monitoring of each stage of production if accessibility and weather at the work site have a majorinfluence on the quality of the work. While the focus here is not on construction management orprocedures, a basic understanding of these topics would aid in the creation of workable designs forconcrete buildings. Cast-in-place concrete and precast concrete are two competing constructiontechniques supplied by various contractors for the structural elements, and a breakeven formula isestablished to help evaluate and pick the best solution. The criteria for selection is the one that will havethe least financial impact. The quantity of works, in this case concrete, is taken into account apart fromother factors. Finding that the transportation and shifting cost of Precast components significantlyimpacted the entire cost of construction, this research aims to help decision-makers and engineersanalyze both concrete building approaches early in the construction planning stage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

  1. Abraham Warszawski, Moshe Avraham, And David Carmel (1984) “Utilization of Precast Concrete Elements In Building” Asce Vol. 110 (4): 476-485
  2. Low Sui Pheng And Choong Joo Chuan November/December (2001) “Just-In-Time Management Of Precast Concrete Components”, ASCE J. Constr. Eng. Manage Vol. 127 (6): 494-501
  3. Gul Polat (2008 )“Factors Affecting The Use Of Precast Concrete Systems In The United States” ASCE J. Constr. Eng. Management, , Vol. 134 (3) : 169-178 ,
  4. Michel Mouret (2014) “Performance Approach To Recycled Aggregateincorporation In Design Of Steam-Cured Scc For Precast use”, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2015, pp. 438-448.
  5. Mohamad Syazli Fathib And Abdul Karim Mirasad, “ Cloud Computing As A Construction Collaboration Tool For Precast Supply Chain Management”.
  6. Alaska H.V. Tran, M.O. Eberhard, J.F. Stanton And L.M. Marsh (21-25, 2014), “ Seismic-Resistant, Abc Connection Between Precast Concrete Columns And Drilled Shafts. ”
  7. M.J. Ameli, J.E. Parks, D.N. Brown, And C.P. Pantelides (21-25, 2014), “ Grouted Splice Sleeve Connection Alternatives For Precast Reinforced Concrete Bridge Piers In Moderate-To-High Seismic Regions. ”
  8. Nurjaman1,B.H. Hariandja2,H.R. Sidjabat3, “The Use of Precast Concrete Systems In The construction Of Low-Cost Apartments In Indonesia.”
  9. Ronak Rajendra Dhoot And Vinny Manocha,(2014) “Precast Concrete Construction : Its Challenges And Implementation For Mass Housing In India”
  10. Neeraj Dwivedi, Why Precast Costs Less http://precast.org/2010/05/why-precast-costs-less/
  11. Abdulilah Al Huthiel,Abdul Rhman Alali,Abdulaziz Al Saif,Concrete technology, Precast concrete.