A Study of Work-at-Height Risk Factors and Safety Behavior in Scaffolding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29070/xb2n5a53Keywords:
Risk Factors, Work-At-Height, Material Shifting Tasks, Worker Behaviour, TrainingAbstract
In industrial and construction settings, work-at-height tasks including scaffolding and high material transfer procedures present serious threats to occupational safety. The purpose of this research is to determine the main risk variables linked to increased work activities and to investigate how worker conduct, supervision, and training affect safety results. Data was gathered utilizing a cross-sectional method and a descriptive and analytical study design. Structured questionnaires, site inspections, and informal interviews were conducted at a few chosen workplaces. The results show that the main risk factors for work-at-height activities are fall-related risks, unstable scaffolds, dangerous platforms, and inappropriate material handling. Even while safety precautions were widely accessible, their efficiency was greatly diminished by irregular use, poor training, and a lack of monitoring. Additionally, the data shows that, in comparison to untrained or inadequately supervised groups, trained and well-supervised personnel had a lower accident incidence and safer work habits. The research comes to the conclusion that in order to produce long-lasting gains in safety performance, an integrated strategy combining engineering controls, administrative enforcement, and ongoing training is necessary for the successful mitigation of work-at-height hazards.
Downloads
References
1. Srivastava, N., Sahu, R., & Johari, S. (2025). Assessing key risk factors for workers during nighttime in the Indian construction industry. World Construction Symposium, August, 180–190. https://doi.org/10.31705/WCS.2025.14
2. Xu, C., Dai, Q., Gaines, L., Hu, M., Tukker, A., & Steubing, B. (2020). Future material demand for automotive lithium-based batteries. Communications Materials, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-020-00095-x
3. Saleh, L. S., & Bryant, S. J. (2018). The host response in tissue engineering: Crosstalk between immune cells and cell-laden scaffolds. Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering, 6, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2018.03.006
4. Demir, E., & Sabır, E. C. (2025). Evaluation of physical risk factors by fuzzy failure mode and effects analysis: An apparel mill example. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 31(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2404789
5. Peng, J. L., Liu, X., Peng, C., & Shao, Y. (2023). Comprehensive factor analysis and risk quantification study of fall from height accidents. Heliyon, 9(12), e22167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22167
6. Hiratkar, T., & Tiwary, A. (2023). An innovative methodology for identification of fall hazards and assessment of risk at high-rise construction site. International Journal of Recent Engineering Science, 10(2), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.14445/23497157/ijres-v10i2p105
7. Johnson, C. K., et al. (2020). Global shifts in mammalian population trends reveal key predictors of virus spillover risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1924). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2736
8. El-Sayegh, S., Romdhane, L., & Manjikian, S. (2020). A critical review of 3D printing in construction: Benefits, challenges, and risks. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 20(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00038-w
9. D. Z. Ananda and T. Srisantyorini, “HIRADC Analysis at PT Adhi Karya Mahata Serpong in 2025,” AN-NUR J. Kaji. dan Pengemb. Kesehat. Masy., vol. 05, no. 02, pp. 161–173, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/AN-NUR
10. B. Burhanudin, R. Budiman, M. Rafiz, and F. R. Robandi, “Risk Hazard Identification Using the HIRARC Method in the Construction of the KAI Boutique Hotel Cihampelas Building - Bandung,” J. World Sci., vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1634–1647, 2024, doi: 10.58344/jws. v3i12.1251.
11. I. Asih, “Occupational Safety and Health Risk Analysis on Skycrapers Construction Projects in the Jakarta,” pp. 5109–5118, 2023, doi: 10.46254/an12.20221031
12. G. Kazar and S. Comu, “Developing a Virtual Safety Training Tool for Scaffolding and Formwork Activities,” Tek. Dergi/Technical J. Turkish Chamb. Civ. Eng., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 11729–11748, 2022, doi: 10.18400/tekderg.711091.
13. Kazar, G., & Comu, S. (2022). Developing a virtual safety training tool for scaffolding and formwork activities. Technical Journal of the Turkish Chamber of Civil Engineers, 33(2), 11729–11748. https://doi.org/10.18400/tekderg.711091
14. Ramakrishnan, H. K., Pallavi, N., & Doolgindachbaporn, T. (2022). Occupational health hazard identification and risk mitigation at engineering procurement and construction projects: Sultanate of Oman. EnvironmentAsia, 15(Special Issue), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.14456/ea.2022.22
