Main Article Content

Authors

Binoy Balakrishnan

Prof. (Dr.) Subhodh Kumar Sinha

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a significant rise in student entrepreneurship across the country, driven by a growing culture of innovation, institutional encouragement, and government-led initiatives such as Startup India. In parallel, higher education institutions have increasingly integrated entrepreneurship development into academic and co-curricular programs. The research contributes to the growing body of knowledge in entrepreneurship education and student-led startups. It specifically adds to the understanding of how incubation and mentorship programs function within academic institutions and whether they effectively translate into viable startup launches. The findings can guide policymakers at both the state and national levels in revising and strengthening startup support schemes like Kerala Startup Mission (KSUM) and Startup India. By identifying the institutional and infrastructural gaps in mentoring and incubation programs, the study can contribute to more targeted interventions and funding mechanisms for student entrepreneurs. Educational institutions offering entrepreneurship development programs can use the study to assess the effectiveness of their current incubation and mentorship services. The insights can aid curriculum developers, placement cells, and incubation centres in tailoring support mechanisms that align better with student needs and market realities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

  1. Audretsch, D. B., &Thurik, A. R. (2001). What's new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267–315.
  2. World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020. Geneva: WEF.
  3. NASSCOM. (2023). Indian Startup Ecosystem Report. Retrieved from https://nasscom.in
  4. OECD. (2021). Entrepreneurship education in the global context: Preparing learners for the future of work. OECD Publishing.
  5. Rideout, E. C., & Gray, D. O. (2013). Does entrepreneurship education really work? A review and methodological critique of the empirical literature on the effects of university-based entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 329–351.
  6. World Bank. (2020). World Development Report: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  7. NASSCOM. (2023). Indian Tech Startups Ecosystem: Year-End Review.
  8. Startup India. (2023). Startup India Annual Report. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.
  9. Mian, S., Lamine, W., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Technology business incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge. Technovation, 50–51, 1–12.
  10. Hisrich, R. D., Peters, M. P., & Shepherd, D. A. (2017). Entrepreneurship (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  11. Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40–50.
  12. Iyer, N., & Rao, L. (2020). Incubation bottlenecks for student innovators in Tier II Colleges in Telangana. Higher Innovation Review, 5(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.12968/hir.2020.5.1.30
  13. Joshi, N., & Kaur, G. (2023). Failure and pivot points in student startups: An empirical study of venture trajectory. International Journal of Business Innovation Research, 17(1), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2023.118943
  14. Keat, O. Y., Selvarajah, C., & Meyer, D. (2011). Inclination towards entrepreneurship among university students: An empirical study of Malaysian university students. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(4), 206–220.
  15. KSUM. (2023). Annual Report on Student Startups in Kerala. Kerala Startup Mission.