Main Article Content

Authors

Dr. Chidanand G. Byahatti

Dr. Sanjay S. Hanagandi

Abstract

Environmental deterioration achieved by customers' non-practical usage design is squeezing the climate and is deterring manageable turn of events. To ruin this effect and animate a more feasible economic development, one arrangement is to diminish or move use designs from traditional items to eco-friendly items. The creators directed an audit investigation of green buy conduct research across the 6-year period from 2015 to 2021, distinguishing 108 examinations that met our incorporation rules. The current survey recognizes distinctive unavoidable facilitators, intentions, and snags affecting customers' dynamic cycle towards environmentally friendly items, and it gives likely explanations for logical inconsistencies found in green buy conduct (GPB). The paper uncovers the fundamental determinants of purchaser's GPB, and in light of the survey, 212 factors that influence green buy aim (GPI) were distinguished. In addition, 135 determinants that influence GPB were recorded. Thusly, other than adding to the writing, it will help policymakers in detailing and utilizing techniques to convince eco-friendly buying, and it will offer a chance for advertisers to create appropriate promoting systems for attracting customers and ensuring ideal deals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

  1. Arli, D.; Tan, L.P.; Tjiptono, F.; Yang, L. (2018). Exploring consumers’ purchase intention towards green products in an emerging market: The role of consumers’ perceived readiness. Int. J. Consum. Stud., 42, pp. 389–401.
  2. Rahimah, A.; Khalil, S.; Cheng, J.M.S.; Tran, M.D.; Panwar, V. (2018). Understanding green purchase behavior through death anxiety and individual social responsibility: Mastery as a moderator. J. Consum. Behav., 17, pp. 477–490.
  3. Bedard, S.A.N.; Tolmie, C.R. (2018). Millennials’ green consumption behavior: Exploring the role of social media. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., 25, pp. 1388–1396.
  4. Ghazali, E.M.; Mutum, D.S.; Ariswibowo, N. (2018). Impact of religious values and habit on an extended green purchase behaviour model. Int. J. Consum. Stud., 42, pp. 639–654.
  5. Moons, I.; Barbarossa, C.; De Pelsmacker, P. (2018). The determinants of the adoption intention of eco-friendly functional food in different market segments. Ecol. Econ., 151, pp. 151–161.
  6. Ricci, E.C.; Banterle, A.; Stranieri, S. (2018). Trust to go green: An exploration of consumer intentions for eco-friendly convenience food. Ecol. Econ., 148, pp. 54–65.
  7. Stadelmann, M.; Schubert, R. (2018). How do different designs of energy labels influence purchases of household appliances? A field study in Switzerland. Ecol. Econ., 144, pp. 112–123.
  8. Schill, M.; Godefroit-Winkel, D.; Diallo, M.F.; Barbarossa, C. (2019). Consumers’ intentions to purchase smart home objects: Do environmental issues matter? Ecol. Econ., 161, pp. 176–185.
  9. Joshi, Y.; Rahman, Z. (2019). Consumers’ sustainable purchase behaviour: Modeling the impact of psychological factors. Ecol. Econ., 159, pp. 235–243.
  10. Hao, Y.; Liu, H.; Chen, H.; Sha, Y.; Ji, H.; Fan, J. (2019). What affect consumers’ willingness to pay for green packaging? Evidence from China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 141, pp. 21–29.
  11. Wang, Z.; Sun, Q.; Wang, B.; Zhang, B. (2019). Purchasing intentions of chinese consumers on energy-efficient appliances: Is the energy efficiency label effective? J. Clean. Prod., 238, pp. 117-896.
  12. Sun, Y.; Wang, S. (2020). Understanding consumers’ intentions to purchase green products in the social media marketing context. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2019, 32, 860–878. [CrossRef] 112. Troudi, H.; Bouyoucef, D. Predicting purchasing behavior of green food in Algerian context. Euro. Med. J. Bus., 15, pp. 1–21.
  13. Wang, L.; Wong, P.P.W.; Narayanan Alagas, E. (2020). Antecedents of green purchase behaviour: An examination of altruism and environmental knowledge. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hosp. Res., 14, pp. 63–82.
  14. Jaini, A.; Quoquab, F.; Mohammad, J.; Hussin, N. (2019). Antecedents of green purchase behavior of cosmetics products: An empirical investigation among Malaysian consumers. Int. J. Ethics Syst., 36, pp. 185–203.
  15. Jaini, A.; Quoquab, F.; Mohammad, J.; Hussin, N. (2019). “I Buy Green Products, Do You . . . ?” The moderating effect of EWOM on green purchase behavior in Malaysian cosmetics industry. Int. J. Pharm. Healthc. Mark., 14, pp. 89–112.
  16. Naalchi Kashi, A. (2019). Green purchase intention: A conceptual model of factors influencing green purchase of Iranian consumers. J. Islam. Mark., 11, pp. 1389–1403.