Main Article Content

Authors

Rashmi Sharma

Manisha Singh

Abhishek Shandilya

Abstract

Fly ash, a by-product of coal combustion in thermal power plants, has been increasingly used in civil engineering applications, including as a backfill material for retaining walls. While fly ash offers certain economic and environmental benefits, its use can pose significant risks to retaining wall stability.  Fly ash, also recognized as coal fly ash, is a substantial global issue. Pollution manifests as solid waste categorized as "hazardous waste," resulting from the electricity generation process in thermal power plants. Some metals such as Al, Fe, Ca, and Magnesium constitutes over 85% of the chemical compounds and glasses found in the majority. It is consisting a chemical range from 70% to 90% including glasses of iron and alumina. silica and calcium oxide. It is important to mention that, fly ash can serve as a dependable and alternative source of ferrous materials aluminum oxide and silicon dioxide. This paper examines the detrimental effects of fly ash backfill on retaining wall stability, focusing on the geotechnical properties, potential for leaching of toxic elements, and chemical reactions that may compromise structural integrity. A comprehensive analysis of the chemical interactions between fly ash and the retaining wall materials is presented, highlighting the conditions under which these reactions are most likely to occur. The paper concludes with recommendations for mitigating the risks associated with the use of fly ash as a backfill material.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

  1. Alam J., M. Akhtar, Fly ash utilization in different sectors in Indian scenario. Int. J. Emerg. Trends Eng. Dev. 2011, 1, 1–14.
  2. Ohenoja, K.; Pesonen, J.; Yliniemi, J.; Illikainen, M. Utilization of Fly Ashes from Fluidized Bed Combustion: A Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2988.
  3. Nisham, K.; Sridhar, M.B.; Kumar, V. Experimental study on class F fly ash cement bricks using partial replacement of fly ash by metakaolin. Int. J. Chem. Sci. 2016, 14, 227–234.
  4. Yadav, V.K.; Pandita, P.R. Fly Ash Properties and Their Applications as a Soil Ameliorant. In Amelioration Technology for Soil Sustainability; Rathoure, A.K., Ed.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 59–89.
  5. Yadav, V.K.; Fulekar, M.H. The current scenario of thermal power plants and fly ash: Production and utilization with a focus in India. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Dev. 2018, 5, 768–777.
  6. Yadav, V.K.; Choudhary, N. An Introduction to Fly Ash: Natural Nanostructured Materials; Educreation: New Delhi, India, 2019; Volume 1, p. 162.
  7. Zhao, Y.; Soltani, A.; Taheri, A.; Karakus, M.; Deng, A. Application of Slag—Cement and Fly Ash for Strength Development in Cemented Paste Backfills. Minerals 2018, 9, 22.
  8. Bingchuan Cheng, Rentai Liu, XiuhaoLi ,Enrique del Rey Castillo, Mengjun Chen , Shucai Li Effects of fly and coal bottom ash ratio on backfill material performance, Construction and Building Materials Volume 319, 14 February 2022, 125831
  9. Zhao, Y.; Soltani, A.; Taheri, A.; Karakus, M.; Deng, A. Application of Slag—Cement and Fly Ash for Strength Development in Cemented Paste Backfills. Minerals 2018, 9, 22.
  10. Valentim, B.; Białecka, B.; Gonçalves, A.P.; Guedes, A.; Guimarães, R.; Cruceru, M.; Całus-Moszko, J.; Popescu, G.L.; Predeanu, G.; Santos, C.A. Undifferentiated Inorganics in Coal Fly Ash and Bottom Ash: Calcispheres, Magnesiacalcispheres, and Magnesiaspheres. Minerals 2018, 8, 140.
  11. Choudhary, N.; Yadav, V.K.; Malik, P.; Khan, S.H.; Inwati, G.K.; Suriyaprabha, R.; Singh, B.; Yadav, A.K.; Ravi, R.K. Recovery of Natural Nanostructured Minerals: Ferrospheres, Plerospheres, Cenospheres, and Carbonaceous Particles From Fly Ash. In Handbook of Research on Emerging Developments and Environmental Impacts of Ecological Chemistry; Gheorghe, D., Ashok, V., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2020; pp. 450–470.
  12. Ohenoja, K.; Pesonen, J.; Yliniemi, J.; Illikainen, M. Utilization of Fly Ashes from Fluidized Bed Combustion: A Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2988.
  13. Fuller, A.; Maier, J.; Karampinis, E.; Kalivodova, J.; Grammelis, P.; Kakaras, E.; Scheffknecht, G. Fly Ash Formation and Characteristics from (co-)Combustion of an Herbaceous Biomass and a Greek Lignite (Low-Rank Coal) in a Pulverized Fuel Pilot-Scale Test Facility. Energies 2018, 11, 1581.
  14. Wei, Q.; Song, W. Mineralogical and Chemical Characteristics of Coal Ashes from Two High-Sulfur Coal-Fired Power Plants in Wuhai, Inner Mongolia, China. Minerals 2020, 10, 323. Ceramics 2020, 3 410
  15. Rodrigues, P.; Silvestre, J.D.; Flores-Colen, I.; Viegas, C.A.; Ahmed, H.H.; Kurda, R.; de Brito, J. Evaluation of the Ecotoxicological Potential of Fly Ash and Recycled Concrete Aggregates Use in Concrete. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 351.
  16. S.S. Alterary and N.H. Marei Fly ash properties, characterization, and applications: A review Journal of King Saud University – Science 33 (2021) 101536
  17. Alam, J.; Akhtar, M. Fly ash utilization in different sectors in Indian scenario. Int. J. Emerg. Trends Eng. Dev. 2011, 1, 1–14.
  18. Langmann, B. Volcanic Ash versus Mineral Dust: Atmospheric Processing and Environmental and Climate Impacts. ISRN Atmos. Sci. 2013, 2013, 17.
  19. Giménez-García, R.; Vigil de la Villa Mencía, R.; Rubio, V.; Frías, M. The Transformation of Coal-Mining Waste Minerals in the Pozzolanic Reactions of Cements. Minerals 2016, 6, 64
  20. Zhao, Y.; Soltani, A.; Taheri, A.; Karakus, M.; Deng, A. Application of Slag—Cement and Fly Ash for Strength Development in Cemented Paste Backfills. Minerals 2018, 9, 22.