Integrated Risk Assessment Approaches for Workplace Safety: A Study of JSA, FMEA, and Hazard Identification in Industrial Environments

Article Sidebar

PDF HTML
Published: Apr 1, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29070/48tjxf02
Keywords:
Risk Assessment, JSA, FMEA, Hazard Identification, Workplace Safety

Main Article Content

Authors

Praduman Sharma

Research Scholar, Vikrant University, Gwalior, M.P.

Vishal Tiwari

Assistant Professor, Vikrant University, Gwalior, M.P.

Abstract

This research examines integrated risk assessment methodologies in industrial settings, emphasising the use of Job Safety Analysis (JSA), Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Hazard and Operability research (HAZOP), and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). Data were collected using a mixed-methods strategy, including field observations, interviews, and historical safety records from the industrial, chemical, and construction industries. The study delineates prevalent industrial hazards physical, chemical, ergonomic, and psychological and assesses their risks via qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Instruments such as risk matrices, real-time monitoring systems, and safety software (Intelex and Sphera) improved hazard identification and management. Results indicate that high-risk tasks, such as heavy machinery operation and chemical management, need prompt engineering and administrative measures. This research suggests that the integration of structured risk assessment methodologies with contemporary safety technology significantly enhances hazard management and fosters workplace safety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Advances in Science and Technology (JAST)

Section

Articles

References

  1. Kim, E.-A., & Kang, S.-K. (2021). Historical review of the list of occupational diseases recommended by the International Labour Organization (ILO). Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 25(1), 14.
  2. Li, J., & Wang, X. (2018). Occupational health risk assessment and intervention strategies for workers in the chemical industry. Journal of Occupational Health and Safety, 16(3), 253–268.
  3. Yari, S., Akbari, H., Gholami Fesharaki, M., Khosravizadeh, O., Ghasemi, M., Barsam, Y., et al. (2018). Developing a model for hospital inherent safety assessment: Conceptualization and validation. International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, 29(3–4), 163–174.
  4. Mahmood, Y., Chen, J., Yodo, N., & Huang, Y. (2024). Optimizing natural gas pipeline risk assessment using hybrid fuzzy Bayesian networks and expert elicitation for effective decision-making strategies. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 125, Article 205283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgsce.2024.205283
  5. Agrawal, R., Singh, S. K., Kanga, S., Sajan, B., Meraj, G., & Kumar, P. (2024). Advancing flood risk assessment through integrated hazard mapping: A Google Earth Engine-based approach for comprehensive scientific analysis and decision support. Journal of Climate Change, 10(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.3233/jcc240007
  6. Sahoo, B., Sahoo, M. C., & Pillai, J. S. (2024). Making our hospitals a safe workplace: Hazard identification and risk assessment at a tertiary-level public hospital in Eastern India. Cureus, 16(4), e59110. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.59110
  7. Wang, F., et al. (2024). Deterministic risk assessment of hydrogen leak from a fuel cell truck in a real-scale hydrogen refueling station. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 50, 1103–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.114
  8. Rattner, B. A., et al. (2024). Wildlife ecological risk assessment in the 21st century: Promising technologies to assess toxicological effects. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 20(3), 725–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4806
  9. Chandrasekar, V., Jayanthi, A., Arindam, P., Syed, K. D., & Aparajita, M. (2024). Integrated approaches for immunotoxicity risk assessment: Challenges and future directions. Discover Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44339-024-00010-w
  10. Kwon, S. J., Choi, S. W., & Lee, E. B. (2024). Hazard identification and risk assessment during simultaneous operations in industrial plant maintenance based on job safety analysis. Sustainability, 16(21), Article 19277. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219277
  11. Ismail, S. I. C., Irwan, I., & Lalu, N. A. S. (2023). Analysis of potential hazards for work accidents using the HIRA (Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment) method on gold mine workers in East Suwawa District. Gorontalo Journal of Health Science and Community, 7(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.35971/gojhes.v7i1.16187
  12. Leveson, N. G. (2021). Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety. MIT Press.
  13. Kletz, T. (2019). What went wrong? Case histories of process plant disasters and how they could have been avoided (5th Ed.). Elsevier.
  14. Hale, A., Borys, D., & Else, D. (2020). Management of safety rules and procedures: A review of the literature. Safety Science, 48(8), 990–1001.
  15. N. Salvatore and A. Pagliaroli, “A Novel Quantitative Approach for Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment of Linear Infrastructure : A Geological-Geotechnical Index,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2025, doi: 10.70465/ber.v2i2.24.