Main Article Content

Authors

Santosh Kumar

Dr. Akhil Mehrotra

Abstract

The purpose of the study was kinematical analysis of an Elite archers. In present study total sample five Indian International level male Recurve category Archers was selected by Purposive sampling technique from SAI Archery training Center Sonipat. The age of the subjects was between 24 (± 5) years, hight of the subjects 6.0` (± 5 Inch), participation year between 2016-2022, shooting FITA score between 650-720 in archery was selected as a subjects for the study. According to Casio EX-F1 high speed camera was used, which have frequency from 60-300 frames per second (f/s).  The data were recorded from Superior view, Lateral view, Anterior view and Medial view. The distance between shooting line and target is 70 meter. Shooting line is passed horizontally through the Center of Gravity box, Center of Gravity box is a square box drown with the measurement of 1×1 m, Center of Gravity box is equally divided into 4 parts. A straight line is passed vertically on it and a horizontal line which is shooting line and is drawn 70 meter apart from the target. The distance between bull eye of the target and the floor surface is 5 feet. Siliconcoach Pro8 update motion analysis software and Tracker motion analysis software was used for kinematical analysis of at the time of final release position in archery. Descriptive statistic was used. To find out multi correlation between dependent variable performance on target 1-10 (bull eye) in points and independent variables (selected linear variables). The significant correlation was found between Height of body Center of Mass, Height of body Center of Gravity, Height of Projectile and obtained value (-.893), (.878), (-.945) is greater than tabulated value of (.878) therefore it shows significant relationship of this independent variable with performance in archery. Whereas, in case of Body force aliment right medial, Body force aliment left medial the obtained values (.360) and (.770) are lower than tabulated value of (.878) therefore it shows insignificant relationship of these independent variable with performance in archery.


The significant correlations with height variables suggest that certain aspects of an archer's body positioning, such as the height of the center of mass, center of gravity, and projectile, play a crucial role in archery performance. The negative correlation with the height of the center of mass implies that a lower center of mass is associated with better performance.


The insignificant correlations with body forced alignment variables suggest that, at least within the parameters measured, the lateral alignment of the body (right and left medial) does not significantly influence performance in archery.


Since the significant relationship was found between Height of body Center of Mass and Height of body Center of Gravity, Height of Projectile and Body force aliment left medial of the subject among independent variables as calculated “r” (-.960), (.887), (-.959) is found greater than the required tabulated value of (.878) at .05 level of significance. In case be seen the significant relationship was found between Height of body Center of Gravity and Body force aliment left medial of the subject among independent variables as calculated “r” (.935), is found greater than the required tabulated value of (.878) at .05 level of significance.


The strong correlations among these variables indicate a close relationship between the height-related kinematic variables (center of mass, center of gravity, and projectile) and the lateral alignment of the body (body forced alignment left medial).


The negative correlations suggest that as the height of the center of mass decreases, the height of the center of gravity and the height of the projectile tend to decrease, and as the height of the projectile decreases, the body forced alignment left medial tends to increase.


The study concludes that there is a statistically significant and positive relationship between the height of the center of gravity and body forced alignment on the left medial side in archery.


This finding implies that variations in the height of the center of gravity are associated with corresponding changes in the lateral alignment of the body, specifically towards the left medial side.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

References

  1. Caldwell, L.S., Chaffin, D.B., Dukes‐Dobos, F.N., Kroemer, K.H.E., Laubach, L.L., Snook, S.H. and Wasserman, D.E. 1974. A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing. Journal of the American Industrial Hygiene Association, 35: 201–206.
  2. Clarys, J.P., Cabri, J., de Witte, B., Toussaint, H., Degroot, G., Huying, P. and Hollander, P. 1988. Electromyography applied to sport ergonomics. Ergonomics, 31: 1605–1620.
  3. Clarys, J., Cabri, J., Bollens, E., Sleeckx, R., Taeymans, J., Vermeiren, M., & Voss, G. (1990). Muscular activity of different shooting distances, different release techniques, and different performance levels, with and without stabilizers, in target archery. Journal of Sports Sciences, 8, 235–257. doi: 10.1080/02640419008732149
  4. Halliday, A.M. and Redfearn, J.W.T. 1956. An analysis of the frequencies of finger tremor in healthy subjects. Journal of Physiology, 134: 600–611.
  5. Hennessy, M.P. and Parker, A.W. 1990. Electromyography of arrow release in archery. Electromyographic and Clinical Neurophysiology, 30: 7–17.
  6. Landers, D.M., Botcher, S.H. and Wang, M.Q. 1986. A psychobiological study of archery performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 3: 236–244.
  7. Martin, P.E., Siler, W.L. and Hoffman, D. 1990. Electromyographic analysis of bow string release in highly skilled archers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 8: 215–221.
  8. Stuart, J. and Atha, J. 1990. Postural consistency in skilled archers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 8: 223–234.
  9. Gallozzi, C., Leonardi, L.M., Pace, A. and Caselli, G. 1987. “A new method to measure lateral bow accelerations during shooting in archery”. In In Biomechanics: Basic and Applied Research, Edited by: Bergmann, G., Kolbel, R. and Rohlmann, A. 639–644. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
  10. Keast, D. and Elliott, B. 1990. Fine body movements and the cardiac cycle in archery. Journal of Sports Sciences, 8: 203–213.
  11. Klopsteg, P.E. 1992. “Physics of bows and arrows”. In In The Physics of Sports, Edited by: Arment, A. 9–26. Woodbury, NY: AIP Press.
  12. Kooi, B.W. and Sparenberg, J.A. 1997. On the mechanics of the arrow: Archer's Paradox. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 31: 285–306.
  13. Leonardi, L.M., Gallozzi, C., Pace, A. and DaI Monte, A. 1987. “Reduction of lateral bow displacement using different torque flight compensators and stabilizers in archery”. In In Biomechanics: Basic and Applied Research, Edited by: Bergmann, G., Kölbel, R. and Rohlmann, A. 633–638. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
  14. Leroyer, P., van Hoecke, J. and Helal, J.N. 1993. Biomechanical study of the final push-pull in archery. Journal of Sports Sciences, 11: 63–69.
  15. Pekalski, R. 1987. “Modelling and simulation research of the competitor-bow-arrow system (in Polish)”. In Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Warsaw: Academy of Physical Education.
  16. Pekalski, R. 1990. Experimental and theoretical research in archery. Journal of Sports Sciences, 8: 259–279.
  17. Stuart, J. and Atha, J. 1990. Postural consistency in skilled archers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 8: 223–234.
  18. Tuijn, C. and Kooi, B.W. 1992. The measurement of arrow velocities in the student's laboratory. European Journal of Physics, 13: 127–134.
  19. Clarys, J., Cabri, J., Bollens, E., Sleeckx, R., Taeymans, J., Vermeiren, M., & Voss, G. (1990). Muscular activity of different shooting distances, different release techniques, and different performance levels, with and without stabilizers, in target archery. Journal of Sports Sciences, 8, 235–257. doi: 10.1080/02640419008732149
  20. Ertan, H., Acikada, C., & Asci, A. (1996). The effect of clicker reaction time on scoring point and the relationship among visual, auditory, and tactile RTs among Turkish archers. Hacettepe Journal of Sports Sciences, 7(3), 12–20.
  21. Ertan, H., Kentel, B., Tumer, S., & Korkusuz, F. (2005). Reliability and validity testing of an archery chronometer. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 4, 95–104.
  22. Keast, D., & Elliot, B. (1990). Fine body movements and the cardiac cycle in archery. Journal of Sports Sciences, 8, 203–213. doi: 10.1080/02640419008732146
  23. Lin, J., Hung, C., Yang, C., Chen, H., Chou, F., & Lu, T. (2010). Activation and tremor of the shoulder muscles to the demands of an archery task. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(4), 415–421. doi: 10.1080/02640410903536434
  24. Mann, D., & Littke, N. (1989). Shoulder injuries in archery. Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences, 14, 85–92.
  25. Mason, B., & Pegrim, P. (1986). Body stability and performance in archer. EXCEL, 3(2), 17–20.
  26. Mohamed, M., & Azhar, A. (2012). Postural sway and shooting accuracy of skilled recurve archers. Movement, Health & Exercise, 1(1), 49–60.
  27. Shiang, T., & Tseng, C. (1997). A new quantitative approach for archery stability analysis. Paper presented at the XVIth Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics, Tokyo.
  28. Simsek, D., Cerrah, A., & Ertan, H. (2013). The comparison of balance abilities of recurve, compound and traditional archery: A preliminary study. Journal of Physical Education & Sports Science/Beden Egitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 93–99.
  29. Simsek, D., Cerrah, A., Ertan, H., & Tekce, M. (2013). The assessment of postural control mechanisms in three archery disciplines: A preliminary study. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 4(3), 18–28.
  30. Tinazci, C. (2011). Shooting dynamics in archery: A multidimensional analysis from drawing to releasing in male archers. Procedia Engineering, 13, 290–296. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.05.087 .
  31. World-Archery. (2016). Constitution & rules: Book 2 outdoor target archery rules, Retrieved from https://worldarchery.org/Rules.